Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2011, 05:16 PM
1.JaVA_Jojo 1.JaVA_Jojo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Default

@ Leggit: here's another one: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...d=685&Itemid=8
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2011, 05:17 PM
1.JaVA_Jojo 1.JaVA_Jojo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 14
Default

i like the titel: the fast ENOUGH computer....it's soo true
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:04 PM
leggit leggit is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 108
Default

not much use to me bud.....i need the fastest computer i can get.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:34 PM
JAMF JAMF is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leggit View Post
not much use to me bud.....i need the fastest computer i can get.
Then wait for the next CPU to come out. If that one is not fast enough, wait some more. Rinse, repeat.



-If you want the fastest CPU out now, you'll end up with the Intel i7 2600k.
-If you want the fastest system, you will need to look at the benchmarks on motherboards and memory too.
-if you want the fastest game experience, look at graphics cards.
-if you have a budget to stick to; decide on the graphics card first, with taking the resolution you'll be running into account, then the CPU, then motherboard an memory.

@Dutchman: If you're from the Netherlands, you could have a look at Tweakers.net and their BestBuyGuide.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:42 PM
kendo65 kendo65 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 908
Default

I don't believe Oleg or the devs have favoured one or the other. I wouldn't expect that it would matter either way - so long as the specs of the system are sufficient. (there may (?) be a difference with graphics card - nVidia or ATI , but we'll probably have to wait until release to find out.)

At the moment the general recommendation in the mags / press is for Intel Sandy Bridge (1155 socket) which is streets ahead of anything else - especially on a performance / cost basis. This is verified by several PC magazines and various online sites testing - with hard figures to back it up.

I intend going this route myself when I upgrade my system - i5-2500K to be precise (or i7-2600K as mentioned above - more expensive but not massively more powerful for gaming...)

The big issue is that Intel had a problem with their chipsets for the motherboards that run Sandy Bridge, and there is currently a month or more delay before they will be available again.

But if you want the best cost / performance returns then this is what I would recommend.

Suggest you do some googling and research to satisfy yourself that these recommendations are legit as there is conflicting advice in this thread.

Last edited by kendo65; 02-05-2011 at 12:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:43 PM
BRIGGBOY BRIGGBOY is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brigg in Lincolnshire
Posts: 275
Default

first of all i would like dutch for bringing this up. i have being toying between a i25005k with a gtx 480 or a 970be with a gtx 570 both with corsair 8gb ram and heat spreader.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2011, 10:29 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

I'm always amazed how the average simmer knows nothing about hardware, but believes that knows everything...

This nonsense topic - with the amazing initial question and all discussion - is the final proof that I need.

People waste a lot of money for nothing in performance, as usual.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2011, 11:41 PM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm always amazed how the average simmer knows nothing about hardware, but believes that knows everything...

This nonsense topic - with the amazing initial question and all discussion - is the final proof that I need.

People waste a lot of money for nothing in performance, as usual.
You know this sort of attitude really gets to me. It all depends on what you consider a waste and your financial circumstances.

To me it's not a waste of money because I want my games to run as smooth as possible, it's my past time, my hobby, my escape from work.

I work hard for my money and I like having the best and most up to date hardware, so I upgrade every 12 months or so. My last upgrade was in Jan 2010 and guess what, I'll be doing it again in March for CoD.

Instead of bitching about what other people do with THEIR money, why don't you contribute to the original question ... or better yet get a job.

Last edited by Codex; 02-05-2011 at 05:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2011, 12:01 AM
BRIGGBOY BRIGGBOY is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brigg in Lincolnshire
Posts: 275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm always amazed how the average simmer knows nothing about hardware, but believes that knows everything...

This nonsense topic - with the amazing initial question and all discussion - is the final proof that I need.

People waste a lot of money for nothing in performance, as usual.
Prohibited content deleted

Last edited by nearmiss; 02-05-2011 at 05:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-07-2011, 09:00 AM
No601_Merlin No601_Merlin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm always amazed how the average simmer knows nothing about hardware, but believes that knows everything...

This nonsense topic - with the amazing initial question and all discussion - is the final proof that I need.

People waste a lot of money for nothing in performance, as usual.

did I not point out people do not need the hottest processor for this application !
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.