![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
@ Leggit: here's another one: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...d=685&Itemid=8
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i like the titel: the fast ENOUGH computer....it's soo true
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
not much use to me bud.....i need the fastest computer i can get.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() -If you want the fastest CPU out now, you'll end up with the Intel i7 2600k. -If you want the fastest system, you will need to look at the benchmarks on motherboards and memory too. -if you want the fastest game experience, look at graphics cards. -if you have a budget to stick to; decide on the graphics card first, with taking the resolution you'll be running into account, then the CPU, then motherboard an memory. @Dutchman: If you're from the Netherlands, you could have a look at Tweakers.net and their BestBuyGuide. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't believe Oleg or the devs have favoured one or the other. I wouldn't expect that it would matter either way - so long as the specs of the system are sufficient. (there may (?) be a difference with graphics card - nVidia or ATI , but we'll probably have to wait until release to find out.)
At the moment the general recommendation in the mags / press is for Intel Sandy Bridge (1155 socket) which is streets ahead of anything else - especially on a performance / cost basis. This is verified by several PC magazines and various online sites testing - with hard figures to back it up. I intend going this route myself when I upgrade my system - i5-2500K to be precise (or i7-2600K as mentioned above - more expensive but not massively more powerful for gaming...) The big issue is that Intel had a problem with their chipsets for the motherboards that run Sandy Bridge, and there is currently a month or more delay before they will be available again. But if you want the best cost / performance returns then this is what I would recommend. Suggest you do some googling and research to satisfy yourself that these recommendations are legit as there is conflicting advice in this thread. Last edited by kendo65; 02-05-2011 at 12:12 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
first of all i would like dutch for bringing this up. i have being toying between a i25005k with a gtx 480 or a 970be with a gtx 570 both with corsair 8gb ram and heat spreader.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm always amazed how the average simmer knows nothing about hardware, but believes that knows everything...
This nonsense topic - with the amazing initial question and all discussion - is the final proof that I need. People waste a lot of money for nothing in performance, as usual. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
To me it's not a waste of money because I want my games to run as smooth as possible, it's my past time, my hobby, my escape from work. I work hard for my money and I like having the best and most up to date hardware, so I upgrade every 12 months or so. My last upgrade was in Jan 2010 and guess what, I'll be doing it again in March for CoD. Instead of bitching about what other people do with THEIR money, why don't you contribute to the original question ... or better yet get a job. Last edited by Codex; 02-05-2011 at 05:05 AM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by nearmiss; 02-05-2011 at 05:45 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
did I not point out people do not need the hottest processor for this application ! |
![]() |
|
|