Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 01-07-2011, 07:05 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

Keep on track guys please.

I've cleaned up the thread a bit.
And lets keep it friendly too from now on.


Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 01-07-2011 at 07:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 01-07-2011, 08:38 PM
Flying Pencil Flying Pencil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 403
Default

While not a priority on my list, I agree, the ability to change the fusing is important.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 01-07-2011, 09:22 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Pencil View Post
While not a priority on my list, I agree, the ability to change the fusing is important.
Fusing or arming???
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 01-08-2011, 03:56 AM
Flying Pencil Flying Pencil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Fusing or arming???
Did I miss something?
The type of fuse will dictate when it will arm, and what will set it off (impact, time delay, disarming, even magnetic for mines)
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 01-10-2011, 05:35 AM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Ok, I conducted some test tonight - although I can skip bomb now, I found out the fuses not only have a 2sec delay but also a 20m cap.

I tried this with the arado at 20m/750kph about 20 times.
The bomb definitely has >=2 secs before it touches the water, however the the bomb stayed disarmed in 100%.
Maybe my stopwatch is wrong... - if not, maybe TD can (or feels like) explain it?

DL ntrk from rapidshare

Last edited by swiss; 01-10-2011 at 06:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 01-13-2011, 03:25 AM
RAF_Swede RAF_Swede is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5
Default

Hello
I would sure like to see a track on how to properly skip bomb now.. If someone has posted one, please point me in the right direction.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 01-13-2011, 03:53 AM
Aviar's Avatar
Aviar Aviar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 545
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
Ok, I conducted some test tonight - although I can skip bomb now, I found out the fuses not only have a 2sec delay but also a 20m cap.

I tried this with the arado at 20m/750kph about 20 times.
The bomb definitely has >=2 secs before it touches the water, however the the bomb stayed disarmed in 100%.
Maybe my stopwatch is wrong... - if not, maybe TD can (or feels like) explain it?

DL ntrk from rapidshare

Well, for what it's worth, this is directly from the 4.10 User Guide:

--------------------
This also applies to skip bombing: the bomb must be dropped from at least 25m and must not hit the ship before 2 seconds.
--------------------


Aviar
__________________
Intel i7-4790 4-Core @3.60GHz
Asus Z97-C Motherboard
16GB DDR-3 1600 SDRAM @800 MHz
NVIDIA GTX 760 - 2GB
Creative SB ZX SBX
Logitech X-530 5.1 Speakers
27" AOC LED - 2752
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard
CH FighterStick-Pro Throttle-Pro Pedals
Logitech G13 Gameboard
GoFlight GF-T8 Module
WIN 8.1
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 01-15-2011, 10:37 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

I am loving. Is very difficult to suceed. Now i am feeling the odds of the fighter-bomb pilots like the real guys feel. Most of complains is because the guys are not suceeding like they did.

I do it (correct skip bombing and hit) only 30% of the times. I skiped i correctly and explode 80% of the times, but sometimes i missed the target. My bombing run is at about 50~80 meters. Bomb explode quite often.

If skip bombig was too easy like 4.09 the dive bombers were unecessary, specially at land targets. Now Stukas and other dive bombers ll make the difference they did do not made until now in IL2, since with this new feature i would prefer high angle dive bombing for precision.
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 01-15-2011, 10:51 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
I am loving. Is very difficult to suceed. Now i am feeling the odds of the fighter-bomb pilots like the real guys feel. Most of complains is because the guys are not suceeding like they did.

I do it (correct skip bombing and hit) only 30% of the times. I skiped i correctly and explode 80% of the times, but sometimes i missed the target. My bombing run is at about 50~80 meters. Bomb explode quite often.

If skip bombig was too easy like 4.09 the dive bombers were unecessary, specially at land targets. Now Stukas and other dive bombers ll make the difference they did do not made until now in IL2, since with this new feature i would prefer high angle dive bombing for precision.
This + the wind; in IL2 4.10 it's very amusing using bombers, far more than before.
Have you tried level bombing from 5000m with 3 m/s of wind?

To me IL2 4.10 is like a new (better) game.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 01-19-2011, 12:22 PM
JHartikka JHartikka is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 14
Exclamation Optional Safety Delay In German Electric Fuse

Pilots Wished Bomb SALVO Fix - Got a Forced Delay 410m Fuse Instead!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
i also thinking that adding this arming time for the bombfuze was the last thing this game needed
With all respect to the fine voluntary work for developing this fine historical IL2 flight simulator I certainly must agree with you!

The IL2 sim used to have very finely made simulation for low bombing modes prior to 410m! The bomb actually bounced or slided in these simulations on the ground like the wartime expert low bombing 'jabo' pilots performed it, for instance!

As a virtual bomber pilot familiar with real history of delay low bombing styles like slide / bounce bombing it is very regrettable that we the 410m now denies these most exciting and skill demanding bombing modes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
German fuses were timed and the ones used for low level horizontal attack used arming times of about 1s and delay settings of 14s. Note that due to the technical characteristics of the fuse the "save" arming time was about 1.6s minimum, lower than that would be risking duds.
Thank you for information! Here is a description that appears to match and supplement your fuse knowledge:


The Wartime German Bomb Fuse with Switchable Safety Delay

A story I recalled from Finnish wartime recollections about German bombs electric fuse. The big German bombs were known to have an electric fuse with safety delay option. It was rather simple yet versatile.

It could be used in automatic 'safety delay mode' (like the forced 410m fuse) or manually in no safety delay mode (quite unlike the forced 410m fuse). It even allowed arming and disarming bomb and switching safety delay on or off during flight.

I have understood that these electric fuses were used with bombers having crew more than on person so the one responsible for bomb release could control bomb arming and disarming. The cases I have collected from my country about small bombs like fighter bombs indicate that these had no safety delay.


German Electric Fuse Circuit Description

There were two capacitors in the German electric bomb fuse circuit. The first capacitor was the one charged from aircraft. It was connected to second actual fuse capacitor through a delay resistor between them.

When capacitor nr. 1 got a charge from a connector attached to the bomb, it would start charge the nr. 2 capacitor through the resistor which slowed the charging and thus caused an arming delay or safety delay. I guess the 410m 2 s safety fuse is related to those bombs having this electric fuse arming mode?

Knowing the capacitor 1 - resistor - capacitor 2 - electric fuse circuit we can now understand the operating modes of this German electric bomb fuse:


Electric Fuse Operating Modes

1. Automatic Safety Delay: When used as automatic, an electric connector attached through a swiveled arm to the bomb would give the capacitor nr. 1 electric charge shot just before the connector attached to a swiveled arm would be ripped off from the falling bomb. Now the bomb would be armed in free fall after the actual fusecapacitor nr. 2 would be charged through the resistor causing the automatic arming safety delay.

2. Manual arm and disarm from onboard: If the bomber staff person responsible for bombing gives the bomb a charge shot prior to releasing a bomb, it will arm itself in the alleged time and when released later, it will drop with no safety delay. He could also decide to disarm the bomb by shortcircuiting the bomb arming circuit. When shortcircuited, the arming capacitor nr 2 would bleed empty from charge through the delay resistor in about the time of the safety delay and the bomb would be disarmed again.

We see that this kind of electric bomb fuse circuit would allow the bomber crew to arm and disarm any bomb connected to onboard arming circuit and release the bomb either disarmed or armed. Further, this bomb arming circuit gave the crew an option to decide whether to use safety delay or not..! Alas, we virtual bomber pilots were not allowed to decide setting safety delay on or off with the rather incorrect 410m fuse...


Regards,

- J. Hartikka -

Finland


First Line HL Pilots about 410m Bomb Fuse

In this thread, we will discuss in proper civilized manner, of course. However, I guess that on the long run regarding developing this historical sim further it may be useful to get some direct user feedback, too. Here are some excerpts from HL pager discussions to tell how noted 'front line' virtual pilots really feel with the flawed 410m fuse. For obvious reasons I am pasting their feelings here incognito:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Experienced virtual war ace in HL pager
...cause low bombing in 4.10 has just be f##### up

I tried to bomb some tgts w Pe-3 at ~ 150m, low level bombing, and bombs didnt even explode...whats the height limit for dropping?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by A very skilled virtual war ace in HL pager
i was told about 4.10
)))
*full ##iiiiiit* for bombers and jabo..agree?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A virtual bomber pilot and history expert in HL pager
nain ne meittia kohtelee kuin spitaalisia))
Translated: They treat us (bomber pilots) like ve vere leprous ))


Quote:
Originally Posted by Respected virtual war player in HL pager
####### 4.10 noob patch-((
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL pager
Fortunately the new 410m '##### fuse' does not prevent all low bombing...

One IL2 kills 14 tanks + 1 flak

http://war.by-airforce.com/rep/rep_10122.html

Wartime Aircraft Photos

Here are more photos that I scanned from my late uncle's album. More old photos are on threads http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...d=1#post210220 and http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...588#post216588
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 49 Hanriot H-232.jpg (20.7 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg 52 Caudron C 445M Goéland Seagull kuriirikone.jpg (26.6 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg 53 Messerschmitt ME-110 saksalainen.jpg (20.4 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg 54 Junkers JU-52.jpg (22.5 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg 57 Junkers JU-87 saksalainen.jpg (34.1 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by JHartikka; 01-26-2011 at 05:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.