SoW: Battle for Moscow and other Igromir news

[major_setback]

I see pavements in some places!
I thought we might see these in a few years time, but not already now. I was thinking it would look strange in the towns with traffic and pedestrians if there were no pavements.

There are some walls in there too.

[major_setback]

Oleg: No need for an English version of that video..Russian will do fine thanks!!

[=69.GIAP=TOOZ]

Originally Posted by major_setback

I see pavements in some places!
I thought we might see these in a few years time, but not already now. I was thinking it would look strange in the towns with traffic and pedestrians if there were no pavements.

There are some walls in there too.

BTW for our friends over the pond: pavement = sidewalk

[Spudkopf]

Originally Posted by =69.GIAP=TOOZ

BTW for our friends over the pond: pavement = sidewalk

Down-Under we call it a "foot path", silly of us I know to call it what it is

[Foo'bar]

Originally Posted by major_setback

I see pavements in some places!
I thought we might see these in a few years time, but not already now. I was thinking it would look strange in the towns with traffic and pedestrians if there were no pavements.

Sidewalks/pavements are considered to be placed ingame since 2006 already No new invention...
http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/stadtreihenhaus/

[mazex]

Originally Posted by major_setback

I see pavements in some places!
I thought we might see these in a few years time, but not already now. I was thinking it would look strange in the towns with traffic and pedestrians if there were no pavements.

There are some walls in there too.

It feels awkward to complain about an image that looks better than I would ever have dreamed about, but aren't the roads are bit too light grey? The overall feeling is that there is more grey than black/brown from what I would have thougt about in Olde coal powered England

[Skoshi Tiger]

The image is over exposed , if you think about the colours of the spitfire it needs to be darkend up quite a bit!

[addman]

Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger

The image is over exposed , if you think about the colours of the spitfire it needs to be darkend up quite a bit!

You do know this picture has been taken with probably a smartphone or a digital camera so there's no way you can judge colours/saturation or any other aspects of the image quality from that picture. Of course the spitfire isn't as bright as it seems in that pic. We also don't know what settings the monitor has and anybody with any LCD/LED monitor knows there are tons of settings to tweak the image with.

[Skoshi Tiger]

Originally Posted by addman

You do know this picture has been taken with probably a smartphone or a digital camera so there's no way you can judge colours/saturation or any other aspects of the image quality from that picture. Of course the spitfire isn't as bright as it seems in that pic. We also don't know what settings the monitor has and anybody with any LCD/LED monitor knows there are tons of settings to tweak the image with.

Your response suggest that I am commenting on the image being produced by SOW. I am not!

I am commenting on the image being produced by the camera, which too me, looks over exposed. It is not a fault with the simulator it's the recording process.

When I've converted the image to greyscale without any other alterations it looks like this.


It still looks over exposed and grainy. As said many times before, dinky cameras in mobile devices are not very good at representing this sort of information.

When I adjust the shadows and highlights I end up with


We start to get detail in the white areas and more depth in the dark. To me this says that the image captured the camera was over exposed.



Winny, did you do any other processing to your image?

Cheers!

[addman]

Simple misunderstanding then and I agree with the camera shot, it's over exposed so no judgment on the games visual quality can be made