|
|
#861
11-07-2010, 12:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
P.T. Barnum was right. To be fair there were things I did find to my liking about RoF. The 3D models are excellent. The FMs by and large are believable. The dogfighting was fun. But for me the pluses did not outweigh the minuses, and coupled with a totally hair brained business model I could not see continuing my support of a sim that I orginally had very high hopes, and large support, for. Lots of others feel the same way I might add. And I was correct about the attack of the zombie fan boys. All too predictable. And sad really.
__________________
 Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#862
11-07-2010, 01:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I only just bought ROF recently (the ICE edition). I am not allowed to talk about my previous experience with the game, but I will say my opinion has changed and I think that the new version with Eight planes and it's current level of sophistication and smoothness is a fair buy.
I was also not very impressed by the business model either, but have since changed my mind. WWI is not conducive to the add on style that Oleg uses, the only way that they can have continuing revenue for game development is the model they are using, and they are developing and improving the game, and everyone gets the benefit of that. I'm only talking about ROF on this forum because I feel that it is a complimentary product, not a competitive one, and that comparisons are valid. (I will concede that while I consider the damage model to be superb, a hard crash kind of looks goofy. There are limits as to what can be done with a computer) I won't comment on this any further. |
|
#863
11-07-2010, 01:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wish people would stop quoting Hecke, so I don't have to see his banal and senseless posts. I wish the Ignore function on this forum extended to quotes, so that I can completely eliminate my contact with people that are just too stupid to deal with here. I have to deal with idiots all the time at work and I'd just as soon not waste my free time on them.
Come to think of it I wish I had an ignore button at work....... |
|
#864
11-07-2010, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by arjisme; 11-07-2010 at 02:50 PM. Reason: To make more on topic. |
|
#865
11-07-2010, 03:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The reason I pointed out the post about the grass in RoF is that RoF is held up as an example of a very good piece of work, and frankly it is far from it IMHO.
You like it, and that's fine. I don't, but for some reason that's not fine with you. Curious double standard you have there. I have never purchased a flight sim just to help support the genre, except for RoF, and after my total let down, I never will again. Now, I am done jousting with you fan boys about RoF. Have a good night, and on to better things.
__________________
Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943. ~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov |
|
#866
11-07-2010, 03:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Off Topic discussions are prohibited in Update threads in order to promote productive discussion and comments between forum members and the developer. Discussions that are of considerable interest to both. If you (the poster of this Off-Topic discussion) made this posting, you must edit or delete your posting. If you persist to violate the policy “No Off-Topic discussion in Update threads” sanctions will be applied in other ways on an individual basis. Alternatively, discussions about IL2, SOW, War, Air Combat and Flight topics are allowed within the non-sticky threads. Off-Topic discussions aren't enforced as they are in the update threads unless a posting is reported. Last edited by nearmiss; 11-07-2010 at 03:19 PM. |
|
#867
11-07-2010, 04:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#868
11-07-2010, 06:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Simple you say something that's not true. Landscape and grass in RoF are really great (at least at low altitude), and you don't need DX10 or a Goldrake's PC to run it. In spite of this, you can also calculate advanced FM and DM. SoW will be better? Probably it will, but it will be probably also the best sim ever. Last edited by 150GCT_Veltro; 11-07-2010 at 07:01 AM. |
|
#869
11-07-2010, 07:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It really makes me laugh, seeing a 500-600 kg plane hit ground almost vertically with at least 80 km/h speed and stops immediately, just some wings and tail bend a little. IRL, in the same situation, you'd find a piece of tail, may be some outer wing pieces and a lot of very small debris, which were fuselage and centerwings, in a crater, made by the engine, while the engine itself will be somewhere 1-2 m under the ground. And this is in the case, the fuel wouldn't ignite by impact (possible). Otherwise all the above would form a nice smoky bonfire. Verdict: rubber planes Last edited by SaQSoN; 11-07-2010 at 07:14 AM. |
|
#870
11-07-2010, 07:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think these physics in RoF look great...If you want to experience true to life plane crashes go to your local flying club, take an introductory flight.. and crash the plane into the ground.
Last edited by undercut; 11-07-2010 at 07:20 AM. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
