Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1801  
Old 11-02-2010, 11:25 AM
Drum_tastic Drum_tastic is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 53
Default

What we can say here is by the time of the 70th anniversary of the first Martian olympic games, thousands of people will be playing patch 4.10
  #1802  
Old 11-02-2010, 12:39 PM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanator21 View Post
The ingratitude shown here is quite amazing.

DT doesn't owe you anything. If it weren't for them, we'd all be playing 4.08. Please, at least show some respect, as you aren't paying them a dime.
Quoted for emphasis.
  #1803  
Old 11-02-2010, 01:18 PM
Xilon_x's Avatar
Xilon_x Xilon_x is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 715
Default

Dear daidalus team in il.2 sturmoivik 1946 patch 4.09 you find in the list of airplane not light.
yes airplane not have the function light on-off and have only the texture light.(this is a bug)
And also i hate AUTOMATIC FLAPS not good.
  #1804  
Old 11-02-2010, 01:49 PM
julien673 julien673 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xilon_x View Post
Dear daidalus team in il.2 sturmoivik 1946 patch 4.09 you find in the list of airplane not light.
yes airplane not have the function light on-off and have only the texture light.(this is a bug)
And also i hate AUTOMATIC FLAPS not good.


... what can i say

  #1805  
Old 11-02-2010, 01:53 PM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

dont quote it plz
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
  #1806  
Old 11-02-2010, 04:15 PM
28_Condor 28_Condor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 108
Default

S!

The delay will not exist if DT had not scheduled a date for its release.

If they had just announced a future release without an scheduled set for others patchs, there would be no such anxiety...

This is an error that can be highlighted (mainly because of it squads, like mine, have taken some important decisions ). The problem is not the delay itself, which is normal in softwares developments ...
  #1807  
Old 11-02-2010, 08:07 PM
rjhill899 rjhill899 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz View Post
will this patch ever see the light???
or it's not going to happend
6 month delay, isn't a short time...
Doesn't look like it.
  #1808  
Old 11-02-2010, 08:34 PM
AndyJWest AndyJWest is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,049
Angry

Given the amount of work that DT have already put in to the 4.09 and 4.10 patches, the idea that they won't release 4.10 is utterly ridiculous: they've already told us that it is in the final debugging stages, and that Oleg is looking at the Guide to give final approval.

The extent they will be inclined to do more after this patch is possibly questionable, given the attitude of some of the ungrateful whining brats who frequent this forum, who clearly think their clueless drivel is of any significance. It isn't. Nothing you say is going to make anything happen sooner, though keep it up and things may not happen at all.
  #1809  
Old 11-02-2010, 09:54 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

I think the right person to ask now about patch 4.10 is Oleg M.

DT wrote here that they finished 4.10 patch and sended it to Oleg M. for accept. Since these time there is no info about patch relase and silence.

So i think that Oleg M. for some reason dont allow them to relase patch.

What is a reason we could only think.

So now the right person to ask for patch 4.10 delay is not DT ( who made their homework) but rather Oleg M. ?

So maby community should aks Oleg M. why he is delaying any info and relase of patch 4.10 which i belive is very good work of DT and hope for making some improvements for these old game? MAby too good or too many improvements?
  #1810  
Old 11-02-2010, 10:04 PM
d165w3ll d165w3ll is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: GB
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
Given the amount of work that DT have already put in to the 4.09 and 4.10 patches, the idea that they won't release 4.10 is utterly ridiculous: they've already told us that it is in the final debugging stages, and that Oleg is looking at the Guide to give final approval.

The extent they will be inclined to do more after this patch is possibly questionable, given the attitude of some of the ungrateful whining brats who frequent this forum, who clearly think their clueless drivel is of any significance. It isn't. Nothing you say is going to make anything happen sooner, though keep it up and things may not happen at all.
Pretty much agree with you. The full 4.09 patch was an astonishing bonus, which I had fair given up on ever seeing. But then I looked back on the fora after a gap of about a year and hey presto, this mysterious cabal of fab fanatics Team Daidalos had materialised and, in a rush of enthusiasm, had completed the patch - the file growing from the beta by around a half in the process. I was - and remain - in clover. I love the Me 410 and fly it almost exclusively. Thank you TD for including it - and the modellers for creating it.

I what they may now be regretting as wild optimism, TD then published an intention to supply a regularly-spaced sequence of further patches. The projected content of 4.10 seems to have grown enormously since then and fair gobbled up their projected timetable. It sounds almost like as serious a step-change as from FB+AEP+PF to 1946.

We cannot complain at all. I suspect though that TD may be slightly regretting not better managing expectations. Another contributor recently asked TD whether they could state when the patch will NOT be issued - as in "not this week" or "not before Christmas", for example. There may be some mileage in this approach.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.