Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 09-06-2010, 04:25 PM
Trumper Trumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 461
Default

If something is wrong ,it is wrong and better to get it right now than after being released,nothing wrong in constructive criticism.
Oleg ought to appreciate the amount of hours and research being provided on his behalf and for our end product and enjoyment.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 09-06-2010, 04:39 PM
McHilt McHilt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 117
Default

Feedback is essential to get a more objective view on details like... a head of a pilot, which is just as essential as the left wheel of the landing gear f.e.
Ok, maybe a bit farfetched but as long as the sim is not out we have to occupy our time other than flying BoB, but as closely related as possible which means:
giving feedback, no matter what the subject is.

Last edited by McHilt; 09-06-2010 at 04:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 09-06-2010, 04:57 PM
C6_Krasno C6_Krasno is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 78
Default

Well, in this case they already said that the pilot was at the right scale, as well as the plane. I don't think that long debates with such trace-lines-on-a-picture proofs will really help them. They have the 3D models and can measure real distances on it.
Reply With Quote
  #254  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:03 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Given the complete lack of responses from Luthier & Oleg, I'm afraid that they're not overly interested in this kind of debate on pilot's size.

I guess that Flight Model, Damage Model, lighting and shadows, 3D modeling, landscape, clouds, campaign and online modes, testing and refining etc., have a slightly higher priority at the moment.

Cheers,
Insuber
Reply With Quote
  #255  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:11 PM
krz9000 krz9000 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 33
Default

im pretty sure they model both planes and pilots on scale...its not very difficult to do that right. sizes of the planes are widely available so are average sizes for males in the 1930tees.
isnt there something else to talk about? ...like that we need more gore?
Reply With Quote
  #256  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:21 PM
zauii zauii is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 298
Default

Omg another nitpicking discussion seriously...
If they'd actually listen to all your thoughts they'd never be close to releasing this thing within a decade.. but hey Duke Nukem Forever just got a release date so maybe this will also come out soon enough.
Reply With Quote
  #257  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:27 PM
Jimko Jimko is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airmalik View Post
I hope Oleg's getting a chuckle out of this thread.

original:
Good pics, airmalik!

Your picture (above) takes me again to this picture of Stanford Tuck in his Hurri, which I posted earlier...the scale of 'pilot in cockpit' looks very similar to me.

Click on the thumbnail and in the enlarged picture his gunsight and line-of-sight are more evident. Other pictures and historic film indicate that the pilot would often lean forward a bit, putting their eyes lower and more in line with the gunsight when firing.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tuck3.jpg (99.9 KB, 27 views)
Reply With Quote
  #258  
Old 09-06-2010, 05:34 PM
Flanker Flanker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 25
Default

I'm getting really angry beacuse people post such stupid posts like' oh i think the guy is 0.5mm too high or too small'. Shut up!The guys know what are they doing and they're doing it wright!
Reply With Quote
  #259  
Old 09-06-2010, 06:04 PM
Jimko Jimko is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker View Post
I'm getting really angry beacuse people post such stupid posts like' oh i think the guy is 0.5mm too high or too small'. Shut up!The guys know what are they doing and they're doing it wright!
And I'm getting angry because instead of polite constructive observations or criticism, people like this have to denigrate others with juvenile expressions of anger! (wright?)!
Reply With Quote
  #260  
Old 09-06-2010, 06:33 PM
zauii zauii is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 298
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimko View Post
And I'm getting angry because instead of polite constructive observations or criticism, people like this have to denigrate others with juvenile expressions of anger! (wright?)!
There is obviously reasons as to why the pilots view isn't as high in the game, Jesus you'd seriously wanna be sitting like that ? Even if its a simulator its yet a game , some things you're just gonna have to live with. How about IL2? Worked just fine as it is.. I don't see any benefit with sitting like that but ok... better view of ground and less view of the crosshair huh.?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.