![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi dfrog. I hope you don't mind me cherry-picking some issues.
Quote:
Brazil - if someone sends me the necessary data I'll put it on my list (one squadron flying P-47 IIRC) Bulgaria - What for? The country's armed forces did not take part in the war against the USSR and we have no maps depicting their home defense. China (nationalist + communist) - Nationalist China is not possible as it would lead to Il-2 being confiscated in China. This is a very real problem and since Daidalos has an official agreement with Maddox Games we're also subject to the same limitations. Croatia (axis) - Same as Bulgaria. What for? There were two squadrons flying under german control (15.(kroat)/JG 52 and 15.(kroat)/KG 2) which could be added but lacking a map and looking at the native croatian effort it's hardly a relevant nation to be added. Czechoslovakia (guess where I'm from) - TD concentrates on the 1941-45 timeframe (Martin said so). During this time there was no Czechoslovakia. 4.10 will contain the czech squadrons of the RAF since that was the most relevant effort of exile-Czechs, though. ![]() Korea (North + South) - TD will not produce any content of the Korea War so neither nation will be added. Mexico (allied) - seen some action in Pacific - See my notes WRT Brazil. Russian Liberation Army (axis) - Historically irrelevant plus it's a touchy subject in Russia (like you said). No need to add them. Spain (republican + nationalist) - ATM it makes no sense to add them. We have no maps and apart from I-16 Types 5 and 6 no aircraft. The spanish volunteer squadrons under Luftwaffe control would be more sensible. Is there demand for them? Israel Egypt Syria - All outside of TD's timeframe and scope. No need to add them. Additionally an Allied Romania (post August 1944) and South Africa would make sense to be added as new nations. Quote:
Quote:
What for? The major difference between early and late D-9 is the fuel and the use (or non-use) of MW-50. No need to add the Ta-152 tail which was a very very rare combination, anyway. There are some additional comments I could make to the rest of your post but I am not entirely sure if that would be okay. I'll leave it to Martin to make a more in-depth reply. |
|
|