Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #951  
Old 05-20-2010, 05:49 PM
bf-110's Avatar
bf-110 bf-110 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SP,Brasil
Posts: 465
Default

DT,what exactly of Italy is going to be exclusive to SoW?
Maps,tanks,BR 20,ships?
  #952  
Old 05-20-2010, 06:10 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Future patches could include a HARDCORE level that does not allow pilot adjust joy and had to fly with 100% joy sensitivity for each aircraft, suffering from its vices and advantages.
  #953  
Old 05-20-2010, 06:27 PM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

The problem with that has to do with the vast multitude of controllers out there, each with its own inherent sensitivity and stability.

For my Logetech attack 3 I use 1,4,9,16,25,36,49,64,81,100

For the Saitek AV8R I use the default, 10,20,30...100

The full 100 across the board is not realistic unless your stick is two feet long, bolted to the floor, and requires at least 40 lbs of force to move the handle. Using these inputs on an average flight stick turns your plane into an fly-by-wire F-16, which is far from "hardcore" in a WWII scenario.
  #954  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:12 PM
tityus tityus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SP - BR
Posts: 43
Default

A few months ago Oleg answered that some sort of DeviceLink functionality that works online is planned for SoW:BoB and that's very nice... I'll be content with that.

However, regarding the next patches, is anything planned in an official patch that would provide DeviceLink with online capabilities?

I think the Multiple controls and Navigation TD is implementing is a big step towards "simulation" and it will be very well received by the "full switch" members of the community. I was afraid next patches would be only more planes, more skins, more textures...

Congrats and thank you!

té mais
tityus
  #955  
Old 05-20-2010, 08:40 PM
robday's Avatar
robday robday is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manchester. UK
Posts: 81
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by daidalos.team View Post
Not in 4.10. It will be finished and released in a complex scenario which will make it more useful.
Now that sounds interesting, and I'm sure it will cause quite a bit of speculation!
  #956  
Old 05-20-2010, 08:44 PM
ZaltysZ's Avatar
ZaltysZ ZaltysZ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanator21 View Post
The full 100 across the board is not realistic unless your stick is two feet long, bolted to the floor, and requires at least 40 lbs of force to move the handle. Using these inputs on an average flight stick turns your plane into an fly-by-wire F-16, which is far from "hardcore" in a WWII scenario.
So, if player sets 100 across the board, his plane will auto compensate the unwanted slip (plane will center the ball by itself), input will be limited and corrected according to current flight situation (no accelerated stalls, no wing snaps due to over G, no spins)?
  #957  
Old 05-20-2010, 08:59 PM
Romanator21 Romanator21 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 507
Default

Yeah that's exactly what I mean smart-ass.
  #958  
Old 05-20-2010, 09:47 PM
Sprain Sprain is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 4
Default The insult of the CW-21

Including the "CW-21" in 4.10 seems like nothing but an intentional insult.

Less than 100 were ever made and it was barely even a trivial footnote in WW2. Yet there are so many important American built planes that are glaringly absent. Planes that were built by the 1000's and participated in the most notable battles in history.

If Daidalos Team were releasing no new planes at all I could understand. But for them to put energy into creating a CW-21 looks like just a way of saying "We want to prove that we refuse to include American built planes".

For simmers who enjoy the Allied side of the Japan/America conflict, Daidalos Team is clearly running a biased show.

Last edited by Sprain; 05-20-2010 at 09:53 PM.
  #959  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:11 PM
FC99's Avatar
FC99 FC99 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sprain View Post
If Daidalos Team were releasing no new planes at all I could understand. But for them to put energy into creating a CW-21 looks like just a way of saying "We want to prove that we refuse to include American built planes".
CW-21 is American built plane
__________________
  #960  
Old 05-20-2010, 10:28 PM
CKY_86 CKY_86 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FC99 View Post
CW-21 is American built plane
Oh the irony

Thanks for the update guys. The work you are doing is truely amazing.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.