Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons - Page 115

Mysticpuma · #**1141** 04-21-2010, 11:28 AM

Actually, as far as it goes on the wish list, I would rather just see a cockpit added to the B-17 and B-24, rather than lots of new aircraft added. However, given the chance, I would love to see the B-26 in the sim.

Just adding a flyable 4-engine bomber would be a great official add-on and look back in the Ubi threads to see it has been one of the most requested additions for a very long-time.

Cheers, MP

bf-110 · #**1142** 04-21-2010, 03:34 PM

There is already the TB-3 as a flyable four engine bomber,but one of the B s would be awesome,specially the B-17,to play as gunner.

Fafnir_6 · #**1143** 04-21-2010, 04:10 PM

Hello,

I agree that the B-24D and B-26 would make excellent additions (as AI) to the game. I also second the motion for an early mark of the Beaufighter (this matters especially to me since I have been flying over the Med a lot recently). I am more hesitant to support cockpits for 4-engine bombers as I understand they involve exponentially more work than single or even two seaters do. If adding a B-17 cockpit means we won't see 3 or 4 other planes in the sim then I am against it. The best bet for 4-engine cockpits may to co-ordinate with the various modding teams out there and see if the existing B-17/B-24 cockpits can be bought up to DT standards.

Fafnir_6

Fafnir_6 · #**1144** 04-22-2010, 04:04 PM

I have a request for an upcoming DT patch (I'm not sure if it has been requested before). Would it be possible to add the ability to skin static (stationary) aircraft in the FMB? I am running a Cyrenaica (Libya) 1940 dogfight server with restricted 1940 British/Italian plane sets and the parked Blenheims at the British base with their Finnish Camo is a real immersion-killer.

Cheers and thanks for any response,

Fafnir_6

goshikisen · #**1145** 04-26-2010, 06:40 PM

It would be great to see the B-26 Marauder added to the sim... even if just AI. I wonder if Team Daidalos would have the same issues that 1C ran into with Copyright infringement if they did tackle the Marauder?

IceFire · #**1146** 04-27-2010, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billfish

Ki-61 error thread updated.....

http://78sentai.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=401

K2

Billfish I've been wondering about something Ki-61 related. You mentioned in your posts about the Ki-61-Id (Id was called "Tei" right?). Would the Id be difficult to add and would it have any sort of performance advantage over the earlier Ki-61s? I'm thinking about multiplayer scenarios where it would be nice to have a intermediate level aircraft in those early 1944 scenarios.

bf-110 · #**1147** 04-27-2010, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goshikisen

It would be great to see the B-26 Marauder added to the sim... even if just AI. I wonder if Team Daidalos would have the same issues that 1C ran into with Copyright infringement if they did tackle the Marauder?

Why the hell a cockpit would be copyrighted?
It´s from a plane with more than 50 years old,and that was made for the Navy.

Ernst · #**1148** 04-27-2010, 11:04 PM

I would like to ask a question about new g loading limits in 4.10: All fighters with no bombs, no rockets and no fuel tank ll have the same structural g loading in service limits, i mean 8G? Or this structural limit ll vary from aircraft to aircraft based on its project? For example, russian and japanese fighters wooden builded ll have minor structural in service limits?

There ll be some kind of reference where i ll known about my aircraft limits? Thank you!

goshikisen · #**1149** 04-28-2010, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bf-110

Why the hell a cockpit would be copyrighted?
It´s from a plane with more than 50 years old,and that was made for the Navy.

Did you scan copyright as "cockpit"? I'm talking about the Marauder overall... which was designed over 50 years ago for the USAAF.

AndyJWest · #**1150** 04-28-2010, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goshikisen

Did you scan copyright as "cockpit"? I'm talking about the Marauder overall... which was designed over 50 years ago for the USAAF.

The 'copyright' saga is long-winded and confusing, and nobody directly involved seems able to comment on it - possibly as a result of a settlement in a legal case. You might get a clue as to what it is all about from here:
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthr...hlight=grumman

Messy, unjustifiable, but something that 1C:Maddox have to take care over.