1C's stance on head-tracking devices for BoB?

[Wolf_Rider]

there's is nothing wrong with development, Julian, as long as the application of the development is above board
I would like all the peripherals to run on their own micrprocessor
surely that was the case that could have been given to game/ sim developers for incorporation via a patch, yes? with no need to tap into NP's

Originally Posted by Letum

No. Not so.
Freetrack's own interface does not use, latch on to or in any other way have
anything to do with NP's software. No recreation of strings; nothing.

However, the game must be designed to use the freetrack interface.
Only one mainstream game currently uses the freetrack interface: ARMAII.

When the freetrack interface is not there, then freetrack will use NP's
interface by the creation of strings that match NP's. Hopwever, Freetrack will
only ever use the old NP interface that NP no longer use.
Freetrack never uses the new NP interface.

thanks that says it all... freetrack hacks into NP