![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: Would you enjoy more realistcally simulated aircraft | |||
Yes, as realistic as possible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
72 | 86.75% |
No, simplified aircraft as in Il-2 are more fun |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 13.25% |
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, i can put all the ideas in one post and try to explain with as many details as possible, or i can write short messages with only a few details, someone will ask me "what do you mean?" or misunderstand something and i'll have to explain it anyway in the next post
![]() Plus, i'm just getting really exited about all the possibilities, I can't help it! ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blackdog, you have some interesting ideas, but if SoW:BoB is as close to completion as it appears to be, they are unlikely to be incorporated if they aren't already in the works. I'm looking forward to its release (if I can get hold of a PC that will run it), but in the mean time I'm enjoying myself with IL-2. What with TD's work, and 'other stuff' (say no more..), it is better than it has ever been. I was online earlier with a guy that actually flew F4Us (I think?) during WWII. He was having fun. I was honoured to be having fun alongside him. He didn't complain about minor issues in the sim, so why should I?
This is a game. Don't treat it as more important than that. Or less important... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yes, it is a game, but we should be happy for every step it takes to become more simulation!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
![]() |
|
|