"Battle for Europe" Competition (PS3 SIM Players) "Year: 1946"

[edal86]

what I meant by "tactical kamikaze" was that I dont want players to use jets as suicide fighters to ram into the bombers.

Most likely I will add Jets but they will be used by privileged Officers only and with severe consequences for intentional ramming. Also, Jets will only be available to the team that controls the German Territory.

[trueshotcaller]

Awesome! I agree - ramming bombers should be prohibited from any plane... to be honest I wouldn't expect anyone participating in your tourney to stoop to such cheap tactics.

This is gonna be fun!

[haitch40]

Originally Posted by edal86

what I meant by "tactical kamikaze" was that I dont want players to use jets as suicide fighters to ram into the bombers.

Most likely I will add Jets but they will be used by privileged Officers only and with severe consequences for intentional ramming. Also, Jets will only be available to the team that controls the German Territory.

no only bf109s should be used as kamikazze's LIVE ON THE SONDERKOMMANDOELBE seriously though kamakazze's are annoying and ruin the fun

[olife]

Originally Posted by edal86

what I meant by "tactical kamikaze" was that I dont want players to use jets as suicide fighters to ram into the bombers.

Most likely I will add Jets but they will be used by privileged Officers only and with severe consequences for intentional ramming. Also, Jets will only be available to the team that controls the German Territory.

why not my bloody,nice,terrible little bullshit of i 153?LOL!!!!
if jets are allowed...
u are the judge .i will respect your opinion
no probs if it is no

[trueshotcaller]

Maybe *all* planes should be allowed... on sim they all have advantages and disadvantages, correct? Unless there's something I don't know about one plane being cheap or something...

[olife]

Originally Posted by trueshotcaller

Maybe *all* planes should be allowed... on sim they all have advantages and disadvantages, correct? Unless there's something I don't know about one plane being cheap or something...

yes agree with u
but i will be ok with or without my 153,i don't want to be laborious , if my 153 is not allowed and if the jet are allowed it is ok for me ,no probs,i don' t want deprive the jets pilots of their favorite plane,i respect all the players and all the planes

[edal86]

Originally Posted by olife

yes agree with u
but i will be ok with or without my 153,i don't want to be laborious , if my 153 is not allowed and if the jet are allowed it is ok for me ,no probs,i don' t want deprive the jets pilots of their favorite plane,i respect all the players and all the planes

OK, I think I found a nice way to allow jets and the I-153 into the tournament without affecting gameplay.

I will soon Post the "Battle for Europe" full description and rules, please check this thread's Bulletin Board

** Any more suggestions before the rules are final, please share **

[kozzm0]

In strike mode, you get more points for crashing into the target with full ordnance than for dropping the bombs on it. That shouldn't be allowed.

Using bombs in airfield capture kind of ruins it too. You wouldn't bomb an airfield if you intend to use it yourself. It's more like airfield demolition.

[edal86]

Originally Posted by kozzm0

In strike mode, you get more points for crashing into the target with full ordnance than for dropping the bombs on it. That shouldn't be allowed.

Using bombs in airfield capture kind of ruins it too. You wouldn't bomb an airfield if you intend to use it yourself. It's more like airfield demolition.

* You could always repair it just kidding, I know what you mean but I allow planes to use bombs for capture the airfield besides they only get 1 chance per death to hit their target and if they reach a certain amount of deaths they will be punished.

* I didnt like that about strike mode, though. I will find a way to make sure that bombers dont do this. I hope that I can trust all players to fly with honor.