Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #681  
Old 11-25-2009, 09:28 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Dragon-DK View Post
Im aware there was only to posissions. But you dont have to take them all down or all up. And I dont think its unrealistic.
That's exactly what two positions means! You can only place the flaps in two positions, fully up, or fully down. If you know how they worked, you can see this. You push the switch down, and a pneumatic ram pushes the flaps FULLY down, you have no choice about how far. You move it back up, and springs pull them back in with the assistance of the airflow around the aircraft.
Using the flaps in an intermediate position can give you a turning advantage in game that those aircraft should not have - THAT'S why it's unrealistic.
And I fly Spits usually, so I'm not just whining because I get out-turned by it all the time or something.

Last edited by TheGrunch; 11-25-2009 at 09:30 PM.
  #682  
Old 11-26-2009, 06:34 AM
Daiichidoku Daiichidoku is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrunch View Post
They had to wedge blocks of wood in the Seafire flaps to get a ten or fifteen degree position for carrier takeoffs.
IIRC it was 8 degrees, but could indeed have been 10 or 15



it was not for Seafires, it was for Spitfires that were being flown off aircraft carriers to reinforce malta

they needed the flaps to cope with the take offs carrying the 90 gallon slipper tanks...that much tankage was required so the carrier and support vessels would not get too close to the danger around Malta
  #683  
Old 11-26-2009, 06:57 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daiichidoku View Post
...it was not for Seafires, it was for Spitfires that were being flown off aircraft carriers to reinforce malta
Even the Seafires only had two-position flaps up until very late on, IIRC. You're right, though, they did the same to fly them off HMS Eagle to Malta.
  #684  
Old 11-26-2009, 07:27 AM
Majo Majo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 113
Default

Salutes all!
I just would like to ask the team Daidalos if they feel any urgency in the work they are doing now.

Do you?

Things like the 6DoF and the "new ZUTI´s world" scenario possibilities among others are of a great importance.

From my point of view the community will evolve in three main species.
- MODs, just MOS, more MOD, MODs, MODS,... or Do you want me to pay for a Patch?
- No mods, what for MODS?, what is MODS?, MODS who... or How much?
- Double installation, the best of two worlds or please not too much?

My special interest is in this last group. Hopefully it would be dominant and more significant of all three.
But who is going to get first there?
Team Daidalos and its new official patch with the critical really big improvements or the “mega super uber hyper
unified MOD extra pack XUA24.0.5”?
Who is going to set up the new standard?
Who is going to get the big chunk?

And here is where I would like to introduce an economic term “the cost of quality” please do not mistake with
"the cost of poor quality".
As important as quality is, there is a point where to maintain or increase the inversion in quality is not economically
justified by the obtained results. Time is gold.

This of course would apply to many other things, some of them even within this forum.

Regards Majo.

Last edited by Majo; 11-26-2009 at 07:33 AM.
  #685  
Old 11-26-2009, 10:26 AM
mkubani mkubani is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 92
Default

Users set up the standards based on their personal characteristics and preferences. Some prefer more quantity and less accuracy, other need just the opposite. You are one to choose, not us. If the IL-2 community respected the official developer of the sim, there would only 1 standard today - the closed official version 4.08 or 4.09. IL-2 was never intended as an open-architecture sim, no matter how many pro or con arguments there might be. The reality is different now, but please do not put us into the position to compete with the mods. It was never our intention.

Time is always an issue in everything but not because of your reason who gets "there" first.
__________________

Last edited by mkubani; 11-26-2009 at 10:41 AM.
  #686  
Old 11-26-2009, 02:21 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkubani View Post
Users set up the standards based on their personal characteristics and preferences. Some prefer more quantity and less accuracy, other need just the opposite. You are one to choose, not us. If the IL-2 community respected the official developer of the sim, there would only 1 standard today - the closed official version 4.08 or 4.09. IL-2 was never intended as an open-architecture sim, no matter how many pro or con arguments there might be. The reality is different now, but please do not put us into the position to compete with the mods. It was never our intention.

Time is always an issue in everything but not because of your reason who gets "there" first.
I wouldn't nessesarily call modding Il2 disrespectful to Oleg, because everyone creating mods acknowledges that their work is merely building on what Oleg has already done.

Even Oleg himself has acknowledged that some of the Mods do thing he would have liked to do but did not have the time to do before Maddox Games discontinued support for Il2.
  #687  
Old 11-26-2009, 04:53 PM
Bulgarian Bulgarian is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David603 View Post
I wouldn't nessesarily call modding Il2 disrespectful to Oleg, because everyone creating mods acknowledges that their work is merely building on what Oleg has already done.
David,it's hard to see the logic behind your words and their connection with the topic here.
Martin pointed out very well in pure English that DT's objective is not (and never have been) to compete with the mods.
  #688  
Old 11-26-2009, 05:27 PM
zaelu zaelu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 86
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulgarian View Post
David,it's hard to see the logic behind your words and their connection with the topic here.
Martin pointed out very well in pure English that DT's objective is not (and never have been) to compete with the mods.
I think here you are missing the boat by some inches... The moding community is competing with you... either by collective "free will" or not. A sign of it? Think how long it took to major mod packs to include 4.09final.

Ghandi had a saying...

First they ignore you... then they fight you... then you win.

Many simmers were against moding at first and passed through the same stages... now is your turn.
You are trying desperately to ignore them but, before you launch the new uber duper patch with triggers and the rest "announced but is not sure it will be included" (the old story) ZUTI's MDS will be far away. And guess what... when triggers do come into view by a royal patch... they will be cannibalized and modified and improved cause this is what "open source is" and this is how a distributed system work.

Then you will fight them... and eventually out of resources...

Like it or not... IL2 is almost open source... intended or not. You have your chance to collaborate and help IL-2 be better in this "brave new world" or... you can try to obstruct the new normal course and turn your back to what IL-2 fans had worked.

And this discussion is on topic as it is trying to establish your exact attitude in regard of moding community and they workings.
  #689  
Old 11-26-2009, 05:54 PM
Bulgarian Bulgarian is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaelu View Post
IL2 is almost open source...
This makes me smile.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaelu View Post
And this discussion is on topic as it is trying to establish your exact attitude in regard of moding community and they workings.
Everyone is free to discuss their work elsewhere.
As far as it goes to the topic,this thread is named "Daidalos Team's Room -QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS ONLY on IL2 Authorized Addons" on purpose,I think.

PS:No hard feelings,since some people tend to think that I speak in offensive manner,my pardons to them.It's the way I speak.
  #690  
Old 11-26-2009, 06:05 PM
Sita Sita is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 943
Default Il 4

Hello DT

Here such question
One good person undertook creations of a cockpit for Il4

The help is necessary!!! In a type of information, drawings or photos...

Who can help?... A question not only to DT... to all....

look at http://forum.aviaskins.com/showthread.php?t=880

may be it will be Authorized Addons with your help
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0002.jpg (209.8 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg 0003.jpg (209.1 KB, 34 views)
File Type: jpg grab00.jpg (183.0 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg grab0004.jpg (216.9 KB, 34 views)

Last edited by Sita; 11-26-2009 at 06:07 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.