Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:32 PM
ChrisDNT ChrisDNT is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 298
Default

And why simply not choose the Lock-On solution, which is the best "middle-term" solution, for not having a ghost flying the aircraft ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:44 PM
Foo'bar Foo'bar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niedersachsen, Deutschland
Posts: 662
Talking

I believe that Oleg and the team will do it right
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:45 PM
Lucas_From_Hell Lucas_From_Hell is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisDNT View Post
And why simply not choose the Lock-On solution, which is the best "middle-term" solution, for not having a ghost flying the aircraft ?
It's good too, but, honestly, if you can have an animated model inside the cockpit, why to have only legs? Plus, I dislike that because I can't see the rudder pedals...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-23-2009, 05:58 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

I'd rather there wasn't. Too much effort for the team, too little reward. I've never had serious problems with immersion from not seeing a pilot in cockpit view.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:33 PM
ECV56_Lancelot ECV56_Lancelot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrunch View Post
I'd rather there wasn't. Too much effort for the team, too little reward. I've never had serious problems with immersion from not seeing a pilot in cockpit view.
Me too, just trying to get in formation, avoid enemy fire, or maneuvering for the kill, the least thing you notice is there is a virtual pilot on the cockpit.
Maybe i will accept seeing a gunner if you are the pilot, on the Me-110 for example, or seeing the pilot if you are the gunner, but again, it would be very down on list of things to add.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-23-2009, 07:59 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Yeah, I agree. Looking back from a gunner position and seeing the aircraft's controls moving on their own would be pretty weird.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2009, 08:07 PM
Lucas_From_Hell Lucas_From_Hell is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrunch View Post
Yeah, I agree. Looking back from a gunner position and seeing the aircraft's controls moving on their own would be pretty weird.
Not quite, it's better to look and think "There's someone ghost flying this aircraft!" than "There's no one flying this aircraft!"

Anyway, I don't think this is too time consuming to the point it should be ignored. We're talking about basic animations - legs pushing rudder left and right; right hand moving the stick around; left hand taking care of the throttle. But, of course, isn't anything close to top in priorities list. These details should be left for last (but not least), when the major things are done.

The point of having such small and, apparently silly things is that good simulators separate from the rest by the ammount of detail in it. These are those pilot animations, the cockpit sliding back, glasses breaking under fire, and all those little things that make you actually feel inside the cockpit, under pressure, under fire, and under G, rather than sitting in a chair in front of a monitor.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2009, 08:17 PM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

Well, my perspective is that I'd rather use my imagination that rely on game developers modeling some 3D arms and legs that aren't attached to me, I can't move, and obscure instruments that I might want to read.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.