|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
10-23-2009, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Clearly this is a continuation of assets from Birds of Prey - a port.
Given that, they have a long way to go. The console version has nowhere near the attention to detail as 1946, it's buggy, the flight models were somehow messed up on a quite a few planes (ta-152, fw190, p51, p47). You can't change weapon convergence, fuel load, or weapon loadouts. In fact, some versions (K4) of the 109 forced you to fly with gun pods - no option to remove them. They used one cockpit for every plane type and even subbed the p47 cockpit for the p51. No selectable difficulty menu like 1946 - just 3 set in stone settings. The damage model (while looking graphically nice) was simplified, for instance if you tried to belly land - the game was programmed to just make you blow up if you don't land: 1. on a runway, 2. with gear down. Belly landings were impossible. Online play even in sim did not require you to RTB and land to collect max points for kills. Also the multiplayer system did not have a dedicated server - you played a match with the people who joined intially, if they left, no one can join in middle of match to even teams - poorly done. They have a LONG way to go to get this as fun as IL2 1946 is, even longer to get this where SOW will be. Last edited by fuzzychickens; 10-23-2009 at 05:44 PM. 
|
|
#14
10-23-2009, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not even close
If you look at the cockpits in the sim hq thread vs the SOW updated spitfire cockpit , there is no comparison.
http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/grab0100.jpg And the BOB SOW update is stated to be a WIP . . . so its going to be better when SOW BOB comes out. Now that others have said it is birds of prey, the graphics in SIM HQ do look console-ish. They look like IL-2 1946 modded graphics cockpits, nothing near the SOW spitfire Nothing to worry about.
|
|
#15
10-24-2009, 06:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am 99% sure that the 109 cockpit is dumped form IL2.
__________________
Why do some people tend to take it for granted that others have poorer knowledge background than themselves regarding the argument while they actually don't have a clue who they are arguing with in the first place? 
|
|
#16
10-24-2009, 10:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
and what about Jet Thunder??? is not a little competition? Harrier and Sea Harrier against Skyhawk and Mirage III/V/ Superetendars in dogfights whit crappy old missils and cannons?
look this graphics of thunderworks...   is not a bad job, at all
__________________
 Core2Quad 9400 2.66Ghz 45nm - 4x2gb ddr2 800 Kingston = 8GBRAM - XFX Radeon HD 5850 Black Edition 1Gb DDR5 765Mhz/1440steam/ 4.5Gbps- 1/2 Terabyte Wn D 32mb - Mother Assus P5QLE - P&C Silencer 750W - Sentey RJA246 LCD 4 coolers - DVD/RW 20x LG - LCD Samsung P2350n 23" - Edifier C2 2.1+1 waiting for: Il-2: Armée de l’Air; Continuation War; Battle for Moscow; Stalingrad; El Alamein; Sicily; The West Air Campaign; Berlin ZakKandrachoff
|
|
#17
10-24-2009, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd love to see the requirements to run that with all the bells and whistles with playable frames with graphics like that.
 Flyingbullseye
|
|
#18
10-26-2009, 12:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
10-26-2009, 01:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.thunder-works.com/news.htm
|
|
#20
10-26-2009, 06:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This isn't even the game lol! Try these instead. Still not bad, but not quite SoW. There isn't even self-shader:    Looks more like LOMAC. It's very interesting though, and thanks for pointing our attention to it.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
