![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
hey ![]() ![]() What difficulty do you play on I wonder? I play sim mostly. you say it is 'little less effective in dogfight'. I really ahd to laugh at that one ![]() ![]() I really DO agree with its deadly potential in strike. I dont have the B-17 yet, but the P-47 does a better job than most bombers. Not as well as the B-17, but if the B-17 guy is not 100% accurate with his bombs, you can beat him with the P-47 ![]() I have used it a few times in CTA as well. It sure does work depending on your role. Because it is so rugged, it is a good plane to land (its also easy to land). it has nice bombs, but because of its turn, you normally only get 1 chance to drop you bombs.. you wont have time for a 180. (if you throw them, the 1000lbs will most likely kill, but sometimes you are too low, and the bombs dont drop, then you are in trouble). I prefer for instance the spit XVI. It has perfect dogfight capabilitys to keep people from landing in the first place. And its 250lbs bombs will do the job as well. BUT i can understand that someone likes it in CTA ![]() I just dont agree for even 1%, that it is 'little less effective in dogfights'.It is a complete incapable dogfighter if you ask me. It is not fast enough to zoom. The enemy will outrun you, or you will be closing very slowly. If he decides to turn even just a little, you will not be able to follow. Same with a climb, if he climbs, you will not be able to make the same steep angle, and you wont be able to maintain a climb for long. The P-47 is a nice plane for strike, but even the very broken P-51, will be able to outdogfight is every time. Not bitching on your post ![]() ![]() If you disagree with my post, dont be angry ![]() ![]() EDIT: I see I put a nice amount of smileys in that post ^^ ![]() Last edited by MorgothNL; 10-11-2009 at 12:15 PM. |
|
|