![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Do you reallly notice that much difference from the burning fuel in this game? And if it was a full tank, like the devs said, it would take about 6 hours to burn the fuel to a nice combat amount ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you can trim to a nice level flight you could just leave it flying in training and go do something else*, the map edge magic turn around would do all the work.
(*-popping back now and then to check its all okay, and assuming you made the AI plane something slow and with equally as big tanks....and stupid.). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() because that is what we want right? to have the same endurance in the P-51 as in a 109. I dont want the 'advantage' of having a higher endurance. I want the same endurance, and with the according performance. i know the P-51 strenghts are the endurance and its high alt performance, but in this game you dont fly above 5000' and to stay in the air for more than 30 min ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not suggesting you do it every game!
It was meerly a way to answer your question. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I wasnt saying it was a stuppid answer, because it is the only way to find out. It was just wondering if you actually thought I would do that for 6 hours ![]() ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wasn't it fairly common practice to jettison the left over fuel in your wing tanks before you actually got into combat? As I understand it was done for safety but it would also have the beneficial effects we've been talking about.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I hope the devs will just fill the internal tanks for 25% or so, thats more than enough, and will hopefully make it fly like the 1946 version |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well no wonder the plane sucks- if its a flying gas tank it's not going to be a good dogfighter until most of it's fuel is gone.
|
![]() |
|
|