Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 09-13-2009, 01:24 PM
II/JG54_Emil II/JG54_Emil is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 208
Default

just found this post on Mission4Today
Quote:
Originally Posted by char_aznable
I'm glad to inform you that patch 4.09 release candidate has just been recompiled. After intensive testing, if no further bug will be found, it will be officially released soon.

PS. It will take surely less than "Two Weeks".
  #162  
Old 09-13-2009, 02:20 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WWFlybert View Post
Even for clarity on the same side, no reason for there to be German markings for a Zero, if the server chooses

This.

There is always some dolt with a JG in his tag that refuses to use the Hinomaru when flying Japanese. I even know one who tried on one of my infrequent servers to wear crosses on a Mustang when he flew Allied because it was his "squad" markings. He got the boot.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #163  
Old 09-13-2009, 05:44 PM
rakinroll rakinroll is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Türkiye
Posts: 527
Default

Hello again,

is it possible to add "auto save option" for last sortie? It woukd be great for someone who wants to save his flights always.

Thanks...
  #164  
Old 09-13-2009, 10:36 PM
llama_thumper's Avatar
llama_thumper llama_thumper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 50
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by WWFlybert View Post
It would make more sense for server to be able to restrict markings available on each side, then no one can make a mistake if they switch sides or come from another server where they were playing on the other side.

Even for clarity on the same side, no reason for there to be German markings for a Zero, if the server chooses

I really don't mind - kills according to markings would at least give a positive incentive to a) not put on the wrong markings b) hunt people down who put on wrong markings.

granted though that it might be not the cleanest way of doing it - if missions could restrict what markings are available for each side, that would be a dream... any chance of having this implemented?
  #165  
Old 09-14-2009, 04:50 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llama_thumper View Post
I really don't mind - kills according to markings would at least give a positive incentive to a) not put on the wrong markings b) hunt people down who put on wrong markings.
or c) choose the wrong markings, and sit on the tarmac in a turret equipped bomber shooting at team-mates, and never get auto-kicked because negative points won't be awarded.

Still, that's taking it literally, and the game should know that German markings don't go on a B25.

Last edited by julian265; 09-14-2009 at 04:58 AM.
  #166  
Old 09-14-2009, 11:04 AM
GF_Mastiff's Avatar
GF_Mastiff GF_Mastiff is offline
71st_Mastiff
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EL Centro
Posts: 890
Default

I wish there was dynamic kill markings...
__________________
71st Eagle Squadron
www.anon6.com - Blogger on DCS Series
71st Mastiff's You-Tube
" any failure you meet is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back "
Asus||i7x5930k||16gb3200||GTX10808gb||ATX1200Corsa ir||CBTitanium7.1||Win10x64||TrackIr4Pro/ir||gladiator pro mkII||siatekpedals||X52Throttle||G15Keyboard/RazerMouse||
32"LCD||2x7" lilliputs,1x9inc
  #167  
Old 09-14-2009, 11:30 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Personally, on my graphic setting, I recognise the aircraft by their shape and actions (friendly or otherwise)

I can't see the national markings at a distance and the only real time I notice wrong markings on a friendly aircraft is when their next to me on the runway.

It's not really an issue for me.

That said, if your on a server and the rules say to wear the right markings, I'ld follow the rules.

Cheers
  #168  
Old 09-14-2009, 12:14 PM
I/ZG52_Gaga I/ZG52_Gaga is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 174
Default

" Originally Posted by char_aznable
I'm glad to inform you that patch 4.09 release candidate has just been recompiled. After intensive testing, if no further bug will be found, it will be officially released soon."



Yes but not with the promised plane set ...

not a really hot update therefore ....

What hapened and plans changed?

We were suposed to be stuned with a great surprize of a magnificent (while burning )
4 engine bomber plus the Radar thingy ...

quite disaponting actually.
  #169  
Old 09-14-2009, 01:03 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Thumbs down

Neither a 4-engined bomber nor anything regarding radar or triggers were promised for 4.09. All of that (apart from the 4-engined bomber, where did that come from?) was clearly marked as WIP and stuff for the time after 4.09. It would be a nice thing if people started reading what is being posted and stopped reading just what they want to read.
  #170  
Old 09-14-2009, 01:16 PM
FC99's Avatar
FC99 FC99 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fall_Pink? View Post
Huge changes and new standards? Could you elaborate a tiny bit on that?

I can think of a lot of things but have no idea if then can be made at all when the whole thing keeps on running on a single core. I mean, a lot can be improved w.r.t. things like 'to know when and how to engage or disengage', Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, Situation Awareness/Assessment and Prioritization, Training level and Proficiency, Moral, RL tactics and so on, but that would truly mean a huge undertaking. It would however change the game radically (running at 1 fps)
Hi,
I'm old enough to remember days of ZX80 Even than you could find very exciting and interesting games. It is all about imagination.

IMO today PC are so powerful that most of game designer took a Hollywood approach in game making. Let's put as many special effect as we can and forget about the substance. Unfortunately that approach work very well. I'm somewhat disappointed to see how much are players influenced with Hollywood BS but that doesn't mean that DT will follow the same route.

We have few ideas that will make AI more interesting IMO, we will not make dramatic changes in code but I believe that several small changes can change game experience a lot. IMO it's all about creating illusion, we don't have to make smart AI, we only need to make player think that AI is smart.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eki
A suggestion for the next patches: If you start working with the GUI, could you add a possibility to save ip-addresses of different multiplayer servers into a some sort of list under the multiplayer menu? That would really help those who don't use Hyper Lobby. Currently you have to copy-paste or write the ip address every time you want to change the multiplayer server.
We will try to do something about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss
Approach patterns - the large semi-circle for landings not sensible or realistic.

Flying around in approach pattern circles , especially when the enemy is so close to the airbase, i.e., Henderson field,Guadalcanal. would not have been too dangerous. Straight in and straight out approaches was the only way to avoid small arms fire.

Consistent circular fixed patterns also overlap when several airbases are in close proximity.

Straight in and straight out with holding patterns further away from the airbases would make more sense.
We have made several landing patterns, which one will be used depend on mission maker, that change will be included in 5.0 probably.

You will be able to chose between:
1.Normal Left
2.Normal Right
3.Short Left
4.Short Right
5.Straight In

All of them accessible through FMB.

FC
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.