I got this PM from a trusted community member today... This issue has been around here for as long as I can remember, therefore I am going to sticky this to the top of the boards for 7 days... Then I will move it, but IMO it is important enough and certainly such a historically controversial topic to warrant such treatment.
If he wants to name himself then by all means do so.. but since he sent this to me in a PM I will not post his name. The pictures speak for themselves.
Oleg got it right.
Quote:
BC
The statement has been made no one has sat in an FW-190 to show this
This is not true.... I have had the opportunity to sit in an FW-190D13 (Rotte 7 When it was under reconstruction at Champlain in AZ) and take pictures.
When I tried to SHOW this proof I was lambasted...
|
finally look at this and note the apparent thickness of the glass on the far side versus the actual thickness of the glass on the near side
This speaks volumes, and certainly much louder than the "opinions" of any simmers here, even myself, because I had an "opinion" on the issue as well, and apparently I, like all the others who said otherwise were wrong.