Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Mods, discussions, links, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #331  
Old 07-26-2011, 10:27 AM
Ekar Ekar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 73
Default

Hi Philip I've been busy at work (texturing a soccer ball for a Nike ad) so there's been little progress on the terrain. Thanks for the nice comment- as far as I remember you live close to Dover (or are atleast an English native) so I am listening closely to what you say. It's good to know I'm on the right track... and yeah, I checked out some 'burnished' fields and I see what you mean there.

Cheers-
Reply With Quote
  #332  
Old 07-26-2011, 09:11 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Hi mate
Yes, I live in Kent, and have flown over Dover a number of times (and driven around there many times as well). It's great to see your enthusiasm towards this, and it's nice to see as well how open you are to constructive comments. I can't wait to see the final results.
your work certainly sounds interesting, too!
Reply With Quote
  #333  
Old 07-27-2011, 08:07 AM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Hey EKar, ive only just seen your screenshots and that is a huge improvement!!! Im in the south of England and im very impressed.

Please keep up the good work!

Listen to Phil, he knows whats what.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #334  
Old 08-07-2011, 05:23 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Firstly, I hope your work is going OK Ekar.
I was wondering, considering the recent update by Luthier, whether your project was still on? It certainly looked pretty awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #335  
Old 08-07-2011, 10:01 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i cant see the update affecting anything anyone is doing here. i hope luthier would have seen whats happened here and it made him have a light bulb moment regards distance effects which is what they have done in the images. i cant see them having re designed mip maps, and i do see them adapting some of my theories. but im sure its a simple shader adaptation only and nothing that will void anyone elses work here.

one thing i do hope for is some performance boost from what they have applied in those update images. its these devices that the landscape really needs to help that side of things. sad but true.

Last edited by Ali Fish; 08-07-2011 at 10:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #336  
Old 08-07-2011, 11:12 PM
Ekar Ekar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 73
Default

Hi Philip.

I've been dabbling with the terrain a bit but I haven't been super focused on it. I'm more familiar with the different textures being used for the terrain now as I've been flying over England to get a better understanding of things, but it has made me aware that there is more work to be done than just the four main landscape tiles, which was my original goal. I guess that's the problem when you start to update textures, the old ones tend to stick out more. Going through the original textures, another thing which strikes me is the fact that, especially the ones relating to towns and built up areas, there is just an incredible amount of work there. Whoever made these must have spent hours upon hours moving around little boxes all over these tiles. I am simultaneously impressed and also a little bemused, because the result is not really very nice. Just thinking about it makes me feel a little sad actually. All that work...

My predominant feeling now is maybe to wait a bit, see how CloD matures before jumping in too far. You never know what's going to happen- I just caught the new update, which looks fairly significant in a number of important areas. The whole thing could be changed around tomorrow, there's no telling. Maybe the landscape guy is putting final touches on things, or maybe the whole terrain is just a placeholder and is about to be totally stripped out. It doesn't make sense to me, looking at these textures- that Oleg could be confident in saying that his system could stand up to photorealism. You just can't get there with these textures. Either his vision and timeframe for the completion of CloD was much broader than what was provided on release (seems fairly likely- there's enough evidence that they're still working hard), or he was stretching the truth in order to make a sale. If it's the former, then their obviously working on the terrain in order to lift things to a higher standard. If it's the latter, then that doesn't exactly inspire me to pick up the ball and run with others in the community, to finish others work.

I think we'll see some good updates over the next 6 months or so. Someone brought up in Luthiers latest thread the fact that reflections had been turned off for planes in the official patch. With reflections turned on in that video posted, the plane looks really fantastic, metalic, realistic. Right now the planes look very dull. I'm a patient guy so I have no beef with the devs in terms of progress. They obviously need time to get things to a level where everyone's happy. They seem to me like they are being rushed. What's with the horrible new/old map border for eg?

Haha, sorry, long post.

Last edited by Ekar; 08-07-2011 at 11:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #337  
Old 08-08-2011, 11:06 AM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

No problem, Ekar, it was a very interesting post. I agree with you on all your points, although it does seem sad to see your work lead to nothing, however I am in no doubt that the landscape will undergo changes shortly (whether for good or for worse)

What this doesn't suggest to me, though, is whether they will change the individual placement of fields. Currently the look of the textures is like a patchwork quilt, whereas in reality, the fields in England are usually grouped closely together reuslting in large areas of grassland and similar areas of crop-fields (rather like what you achieved in you work)

I hope the team have a notebook at hand!
Reply With Quote
  #338  
Old 08-08-2011, 02:16 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekar View Post
Hi Philip.

I've been dabbling with the terrain a bit but I haven't been super focused on it. I'm more familiar with the different textures being used for the terrain now as I've been flying over England to get a better understanding of things, but it has made me aware that there is more work to be done than just the four main landscape tiles, which was my original goal. I guess that's the problem when you start to update textures, the old ones tend to stick out more. Going through the original textures, another thing which strikes me is the fact that, especially the ones relating to towns and built up areas, there is just an incredible amount of work there. Whoever made these must have spent hours upon hours moving around little boxes all over these tiles. I am simultaneously impressed and also a little bemused, because the result is not really very nice. Just thinking about it makes me feel a little sad actually. All that work...

My predominant feeling now is maybe to wait a bit, see how CloD matures before jumping in too far. You never know what's going to happen- I just caught the new update, which looks fairly significant in a number of important areas. The whole thing could be changed around tomorrow, there's no telling. Maybe the landscape guy is putting final touches on things, or maybe the whole terrain is just a placeholder and is about to be totally stripped out. It doesn't make sense to me, looking at these textures- that Oleg could be confident in saying that his system could stand up to photorealism. You just can't get there with these textures. Either his vision and timeframe for the completion of CloD was much broader than what was provided on release (seems fairly likely- there's enough evidence that they're still working hard), or he was stretching the truth in order to make a sale. If it's the former, then their obviously working on the terrain in order to lift things to a higher standard. If it's the latter, then that doesn't exactly inspire me to pick up the ball and run with others in the community, to finish others work.

I think we'll see some good updates over the next 6 months or so. Someone brought up in Luthiers latest thread the fact that reflections had been turned off for planes in the official patch. With reflections turned on in that video posted, the plane looks really fantastic, metalic, realistic. Right now the planes look very dull. I'm a patient guy so I have no beef with the devs in terms of progress. They obviously need time to get things to a level where everyone's happy. They seem to me like they are being rushed. What's with the horrible new/old map border for eg?

Haha, sorry, long post.
that map border was just a placement taken from the old game when they patched the ingame map to work better.

reflections. dont think they were turned off, but more toned down through the mma files. i didnt like the effect, it looked nice and shiny, but they were not so nice and shiny back in the day 1940. granted though because of the presence over enhanced effects it can appear to look better because its more interactive & dynamic in its environment but for me its wrong not realistic. when we see bare or polished metal then we should see these effects and through the series and modernised materials we should see this more.

regards photorealism. we dont get to that level with textures. its shaders that do the job of reality. the texture is just a scale presentation of an object in a non dynamic state. At the core context of Photorealism is the dynamic aspect, One example of further development was the furthered use of a shader that mimmicks distance and atmosphere and the combined colouring chaanges it can make as i had discussed here in this thread, and as luthier told us in the last update.

its all about the shaders with this sim and the context of photorealism.

you have touched upon the 4 tiles factor too Ekar. I had previously commented that if we had 1 or 2 more tiles in that mix to make 6 interacting tiles then we might be able to get further with what seems wrong as youve stated. i agree with that.

if i had free reign to mod an englaish scenery the scale as is. i would have a 9 map grid system, but at 1024x1024 size. This would allow regional variations upon the patch quiltwork effect. 3 main field types and for each type a transitional tile. If i get the chance to for e.g. fully re create the current scenery of england i will attempt this. but within the current format i just dont see the outcome of the work being actually worth it. i.i. no better than what we have at present. no point modding what 1C have done already, in many respects 1C nailed it given the current possibilites even though you may dislike it or be very opinionated of it.

Last edited by Ali Fish; 08-08-2011 at 02:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #339  
Old 08-08-2011, 07:23 PM
Ekar Ekar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Fish View Post
that map border was just a placement taken from the old game when they patched the ingame map to work better.

reflections. dont think they were turned off, but more toned down through the mma files. i didnt like the effect, it looked nice and shiny, but they were not so nice and shiny back in the day 1940. granted though because of the presence over enhanced effects it can appear to look better because its more interactive & dynamic in its environment but for me its wrong not realistic. when we see bare or polished metal then we should see these effects and through the series and modernised materials we should see this more.

regards photorealism. we dont get to that level with textures. its shaders that do the job of reality. the texture is just a scale presentation of an object in a non dynamic state. At the core context of Photorealism is the dynamic aspect, One example of further development was the furthered use of a shader that mimmicks distance and atmosphere and the combined colouring chaanges it can make as i had discussed here in this thread, and as luthier told us in the last update.

its all about the shaders with this sim and the context of photorealism.

you have touched upon the 4 tiles factor too Ekar. I had previously commented that if we had 1 or 2 more tiles in that mix to make 6 interacting tiles then we might be able to get further with what seems wrong as youve stated. i agree with that.

if i had free reign to mod an englaish scenery the scale as is. i would have a 9 map grid system, but at 1024x1024 size. This would allow regional variations upon the patch quiltwork effect. 3 main field types and for each type a transitional tile. If i get the chance to for e.g. fully re create the current scenery of england i will attempt this. but within the current format i just dont see the outcome of the work being actually worth it. i.i. no better than what we have at present. no point modding what 1C have done already, in many respects 1C nailed it given the current possibilites even though you may dislike it or be very opinionated of it.

You might be right about the reflections- I do prefer a bit of shininess on the planes exactly because its a more dynamic look. But I do have trouble believing the original planes were that matt. I mean, they were mostly straight out of the factory I assume. Watching this video the other day-



I also noticed the shininess of the Spit- right in the first shot you see a very metallic looking reflection along the side panels, much closer to the video posted in Luthiers thread, than what is ingame currently. I'm not a WWII plane expert at all so I can't tell you if they've gone to extra trouble to polish the planes up for display or not. Anyway... it's probably just another thing to argue over, like the colour of the grass.

Regards shaders and the environment, it will be interesting to see what changes after the next lighting update. I think they might be headed in the right direction but I still think the textures are very important. They both work off each other. One thing I thought might help is the use of a detail texture- just like WOP uses on its terrain, in order to break up the pixelation at lower altitudes. I can't imagine WOP's terrain textures are higher res than in CloD, but the detail texture helps to sell the illusion of higher res.

PS, Going off topic now, but I'm also really into shaders. In fact, I've just started a blog about shaders and materials in Maya. Its a tutorial driven site with tips on how to make various handy shaders. Check it out when you've got a free moment Ali (although not much content right now)

http://materialism-blog.blogspot.com/

Philip-

Quote:
Currently the look of the textures is like a patchwork quilt, whereas in reality, the fields in England are usually grouped closely together reuslting in large areas of grassland and similar areas of crop-fields
Yeah, those were my initial thoughts about the landscape as well. I voiced my concern to Oleg some months ago about it, he reassured me at the time but I can't remember what he actually said now. PS, I haven't abandoned this terrain mod stuff, I just want to tread lightly and not use up all my energy, or waste all my energy. Be good to let the sim settle down a bit I think.

edit- finally, working AA....

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=25281

Happy days

Last edited by Ekar; 08-09-2011 at 07:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #340  
Old 08-20-2011, 04:28 PM
CrisGer CrisGer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
Default

I saw the threads about working AA last night, that is quite a development.

So is there any form of this landscape texture mod that we can try out?..i understand the decision to let the developers proceeed....so if not that is fine.

Re the shine, i have heard some crews (ground crews) tried wax to gain speed, perhaps that is what they were aiming for in the sim..... i have no idea if it helped back when.

is there any way we can adjust the ini or the settings to get back a bit of that shine? I kind of like it for at least some things.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.