Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-17-2012, 09:11 AM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpang788 View Post
Sorry guys, another question.

According to the game manual,

the 109 has a top ceiling of + - 10,000m

Is this a bug or is there something I am doing wrong here?
Of course late 109's were able to reach service ceilings beyond 10,000 meter. When we speak about the iL2COD "109"we have speak about the BF109-E.

I do not know any document from Daimler Benz, Messerschmitt or Rechlin, which reports a BF109-E ceiling above 7500 meter.

Long story short, a the ceiling of 10,000 meter with a real DB601A-1 in a real BF109-E was not possible.

~S~
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz
2x4gb DDR3-1600
GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB
Logitech G35 Headset
Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42)
Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard
Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-17-2012, 09:51 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varrattu View Post
Of course late 109's were able to reach service ceilings beyond 10,000 meter. When we speak about the iL2COD "109"we have speak about the BF109-E.

I do not know any document from Daimler Benz, Messerschmitt or Rechlin, which reports a BF109-E ceiling above 7500 meter.

Long story short, a the ceiling of 10,000 meter with a real DB601A-1 in a real BF109-E was not possible.

~S~
The Bf109E could only reach 24,600ft?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-17-2012, 11:46 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varrattu View Post
Of course late 109's were able to reach service ceilings beyond 10,000 meter. When we speak about the iL2COD "109"we have speak about the BF109-E.

I do not know any document from Daimler Benz, Messerschmitt or Rechlin, which reports a BF109-E ceiling above 7500 meter.

Long story short, a the ceiling of 10,000 meter with a real DB601A-1 in a real BF109-E was not possible.

~S~
Of course it did. I direct you to the specifications of the Bf 109E, 1939

http://www.kurfurst.org/Performance_...chreibung.html

"Dienstgipfelhöhe.

Die Dienstgipfelhöhe beträgt bei voller Ausrüstung 11 000 m."

Service ceiling.

The service ceiling is 11 000 meters with a fully equipped aircraft.

Note that this is service ceiling. Service ceiling is an altitude at which the aircraft could still climb at defined rate of climb, from memory it was defined by the Germans at 0,5 m/sec in other docs. So the absolute ceiling (climb = 0 m/sec) is a bit higher.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-17-2012, 04:01 PM
SG1_Lud's Avatar
SG1_Lud SG1_Lud is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 376
Default

Some time ago I made some tests in IL2 COD, and became to the conclussion that the info that the developers used was for the engine DB601A-1 bei altem lader (VDH/FTH 4 km) (old compressor).

Those tests were made with patch version 145.50.

I never tested again in the actual patch but I reckon it remains the same.

The same engine with the new compressor (Bei neuem lader) with 13 blades,
DB601A-1 bei neuem lader** (VDH/FTH 4,5 km) gave better performance in RL.

See the graphs below, red curve is my test, fits pretty accurately with the specifications for the engine with the older compressor.

OLD COMPRESSOR



NEW COMPRESSOR

Last edited by SG1_Lud; 03-17-2012 at 04:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-17-2012, 07:27 PM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
I direct you to the specifications of the Bf 109E, 1939

http://www.kurfurst.org/Performance_...chreibung.html
Nice advertise for your Website ...

I am looking for BF109-E documents from Daimler Benz, Messerschmitt or Rechlin, not for wikipedia-like web sites. I didn't find any document on your site dealing with a whatever 11.000 m ceiling concerning a E-version.
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz
2x4gb DDR3-1600
GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB
Logitech G35 Headset
Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42)
Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard
Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10

Last edited by Varrattu; 03-17-2012 at 07:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-17-2012, 08:00 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

In that case you should firmly stick to your idea that the 109E had a sub-10km ceiling, dear 'Varratu'.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-17-2012, 08:11 PM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 173
Default

Thank you for your honest statement Kurfürst.

So I like to repeat:

A ceiling of 10,000 meter with a real DB601A-1 in a real BF109-E was not possible.

~S~
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz
2x4gb DDR3-1600
GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB
Logitech G35 Headset
Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42)
Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard
Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10

Last edited by Varrattu; 03-17-2012 at 08:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-17-2012, 08:31 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varrattu View Post
Thank you for your honest statement Kurfürst.

So I like to repeat:

A ceiling of 10,000 meter with a real DB601A-1 in a real BF109-E was not possible.

~S~
On the other hand to say its a minority view is an extreme case of understatement.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 109eclimb-3.jpg (100.8 KB, 23 views)
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-17-2012, 09:16 PM
Varrattu's Avatar
Varrattu Varrattu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 173
Default

Who painted this nice picture?
__________________
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Intel Core i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz
2x4gb DDR3-1600
GeForce GTX 970 4095 MB
Logitech G35 Headset
Logitech G940 Flight System (fw 1.42)
Mad Catz Strike7 Keyboard
Headtracker DIY 6DOF & OpenTrack 2.3.10
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-17-2012, 09:29 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Its source is AVIA 6/9352 the original is in the UK National archives. The document is a RAE document reporting flight test of a BF109E3 and BF110C.

Here is an image of the original document taken from the file itself:



From the same document:




Last edited by IvanK; 03-17-2012 at 09:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.