Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-05-2008, 02:40 PM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

shameless bump...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:56 PM
Monguse Monguse is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 87
Default

Agreed, waiting for the API belting and data to get fixed.
__________________
FA_Monguse
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:38 AM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

Let's hope Monguse...

Something new to add though: a very recent discovery made by Italian experts (engineers and historians) , with original Regia Aeronautica documents and even studying an original Synchronization unit, found out that the synchronized rate of fire of the Breda Safat 12,7mm guns was very high... In fact , depending on the engine RPMs, the ROF varied from 550 to 700 rpm in the DB601 engined Italian fighters (Macchi C.202 and Reggiane Re.2001) and from about 500 to 700 in the radial engine fighters as the C.200, Fiat G.50 and Cr.42 fighters...

So , in theory,we should see an avarage ROF of 625 rds/min for the C.202 and about 600 rds/min for the Fiat A.74 engined fighters (in game ,we have a ROF of 525 for these guns ... ) Just to let people understand how the reality was different from the guns modeled in the game...

Add to that the non-included incendiary ammos, and off-values datas for the individual bullet types, and you have what we can see in the game...

After many years of misconceptions and errors, we are probably close to what "it was" in reality, and why in fact Italian pilots never had something to say about those guns in general, apart from being only 2 (and instead considered them very effective against fighters and light bombers).

Hopefully, this recent study will be published shortly.

Rick
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-14-2008, 08:17 AM
6S.Maraz's Avatar
6S.Maraz 6S.Maraz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
Default

I have no hope that this can be fixed for IL-2, but I hope that in BoB the Italian fighters will have the correct weapons, at last.

Maraz
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:49 AM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Maraz View Post
I have no hope that this can be fixed for IL-2, but I hope that in BoB the Italian fighters will have the correct weapons, at last.

Maraz
i have sometimes read that the CR.42 of the CAI had one of its 12,7mm SAFATs replaced with a 7,7 mm SAFAT to save weight . is this correct ?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-14-2008, 07:07 PM
6S.Maraz's Avatar
6S.Maraz 6S.Maraz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG53Frankyboy View Post
i have sometimes read that the CR.42 of the CAI had one of its 12,7mm SAFATs replaced with a 7,7 mm SAFAT to save weight . is this correct ?
Yes it is.

Maraz
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-15-2008, 03:09 PM
Xiola Xiola is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 81
Default

The Italian 50 cal should not be as powerful as the RUssian of US 50 cal.

But I feel it IS underpowered.

Look at the chart whihc was posted earlier in the thread as to how powerful the gun should be.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:05 AM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Going by the charts it should only be slightly weaker than the Japanese Ho-103 12.7mm machine gun as the specs are similar. The Japanese gun is better but nothing there suggests a significant discrepancy. In-game the Ho-103 is a reasonably effective weapon while the SAFAT is terrible.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-06-2008, 07:07 AM
Rickusty Rickusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rome, Total Wa... ehm, Italy
Posts: 115
Default

Another bump... for I think, a rather interesting thread... and still hoping for a 4.09 modification...

Cheers
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-21-2009, 11:52 AM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

bump
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.