![]() |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wait! Wait!
Are you really defending the wrong data with a "learn to shot better"? It's like you buy a bicycle, at home you find out that it has only one wheel and the seller explains that you need to learn to ride it in that way. Of course Il2 is dead and where will be no changes.. no reason to whine. But Emil is rightly asking WHY this wrong data in a game who should be a realistic simulator. Looking at the overall data (FM and DM) with my years of experience I can say that the game is clearly biased toward the Red side. Of course there is inaccuracy on both the sides, but "usually" (ergo not always) these flaws are a disadvantage for the Blue and an advantage for the Red. It's like the old story of "the 190's acceleration is wrong" -> "learn to fly". Of course people learned to fly it (mostly because they were prevented from flying the late 109s withone of the latest patches), using tactics and learing to build a good SA. But the accelleration was still wrong (im not talking about data, but comparison between planes) and his performance was/are still worser than those of an A4 with the Stuka's prop. Anyway you can learn, you can make experience and at last you try to fight I16s flying a G50 and you want to lauch the monitor out of the window. If only the modders could solve these problems (but I know they decided to not doing it leaving all the original data, even if wrong: I have friend inside that community). I think I will buy SOW too even if the bias will remain the same... I only hate to find out again and again experts (flying time wise) Red pilots who accuse you of cowardy when they are flying a SpitIXLF and you are in your 190A8... I still have fun because I play in a virtual community.
__________________
![]() A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 02-23-2009 at 07:16 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|