![]() |
|
Technical threads All discussions about technical issues |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Of course what we had before was worse than now. Now, its equally unrealistic. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well at least I can make across with the before, the now, is impossible under most conditions.
__________________
GigaByteBoard...64bit...FX 4300 3.8, G. Skill sniper 1866 32GB, EVGA GTX 660 ti 3gb, Raptor 64mb cache, Planar 120Hz 2ms, CH controls, Tir5 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Salute
In fact, current aircraft can still fly around far too long and maneuver far too long with leaking radiators. According to WWII pilots I have read, once their radiators were perforated, they had a maximum of 5 minutes after a leak to either put the aircraft down, or bailout. And it the hole was bigger, the time could be as little as 30 seconds. 109's had a provision to shut one leaking radiator and run the engine off a single, but that was contingent on reducing boost and rpm, it was not possible to run combat power on a single rad without overheating the engine. I think the current modelling is closer to fact than the previous, which saw aircraft being able to fly around for lengthy periods with leaks. That was not realistic at all. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Jeeez, you mentality is why the game never got fixed in the first place. Any critique is whining according to your sort... Grow up |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|