Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2012, 06:57 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David198502 View Post
ok my statement(bug report) about the B-beobachtung is there, because it already worked historically correct, but now is unfortunately gone with one of the beta patches.
its a fact, that B-Beobachtung was very effective in settings things on fire, and it was very explosvie as well...
indeed it was superiour to PMK, as PMK tended to burn all its Phosphor on its way to the target....so that it happened on a regular basis, that the ignition effect was already gone when it actually hit something...thats not the case with B-Beobachtung...again, it was very explosive and ignition effects were superiour to PMK...
now the explosive effect is gone completely, and the ignition ability seems to be downgraded dramatically.i wouldnt recommend to use it anymore, whereas before it was a must to have it in the belts
(for example it was the only bullet type in the machine guns which was capable of blowing up those fuel storages palced in industrial areas...i wonder if thats the reason, why it has no effect anymore seeing Luthier stated that those storages have now a more realistic damage model....well if that would really be the reason, it would definitely be the wrong way....fix one thing with breaking another one)


ze-jamz...in regards of stability...the 109 was certainly more stable with the last official steam patch(try it and you see how stable it is)...then i think with the first beta, there was a elevator stability problem...this seems to got better, but its still not perfect in my opinion...anyway, the 109 definitely should now get as much love as the RAF planes got...now that both sides are competetive, i encourage the devs to have a look on the 109s as well again....prop pitch, speed, landing gear lever,ammunition lights, the REVI god i almost forgot the REVI,...and so on...the list is long enough.
S!
Agreed about the Beo's...Just want the FM's sorted on both sides, I can understand the red fliers frustration when their steed gets nerfed, thing is there isnt much else to fly blue wise..

Il be having a look at the other models tonight and see if they are indeed suffering from this overheat situ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2012, 07:06 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ze-jamz View Post
thing is there isnt much else to fly blue wise..
g.50?
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2012, 07:33 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
g.50?
You crack on....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.