![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Since you chose to answer on his behalf. Please explain this sentense that Moggy wrote: Quote:
~S~ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
He sent them the data, the Hurricane data was for a plane that is not currently in-game so he hopes that they did not use the performance data he provided for the Hurricane flight model. I also deduct that this makes you angry for some reason... Last edited by von Pilsner; 04-16-2012 at 09:25 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Why does he write it? To boast about it? That he is the one who screwed up the Hurricane? ehem #1... hold on a second! Who said the Hurricane got screwed up??? I have not seen the new patch, or have you? ehem #2... hold on another second! Who said they used his data??? They used Sean's (and he is not Sean). So, recapitalising: why on earth does he not keep his precious mouth shut and his precious rear part sit tight and wait instead of trying to make us deduct that the Hurricane will be flying with 87oct fuel in the new patch???? ~S~ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok
Thats enough speculation in this thread. Too much personal stuff also. Wait till the patch is out, then gentlemen, start your whinegines. ![]() . Last edited by KG26_Alpha; 04-16-2012 at 09:40 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am so stealing that.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I thought many aircraft were undermodelled, not overmodelled (possible exception spit IIa and hurricane speed)?
Could someone give a definitive yes/no on whether the developers are working on the assumption of 87 or 100 octane fuel, or at least whether the data fits one or the other? How can there be so much disagreement about such a simple thing here? Also, if the devs are testing the top speed etc on the basis of a testing program that maximises engine management which players may not necessarily be able to replicate, is that an accurate reflection of how test pilots in WWII would have got the aircraft to perform? All in all, I am more and more baffled about how these aircraft were supposed to match up against each other in fairly basic ways. How is that possible in a simulation on well documented data? Why was this wrong in the first place, for so long? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"87 or 100 octane fuel"
Please let's stay away from this madness and I admit I am one of the subjects who threw oil in the fire... In order to give an answer though, Blacksix has mentionned it somewhere some 2-3 months ago after having spoken with Luthier: They do not model the engine so accurately in order to be able to do adjustments of the octanes. Instead, they create the flight model of a specific airplane according to the historic performance data they have in their posession. ~S~ |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does anyone else get the feeling this is turning into personal attack and abuse?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
~S~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
P.S. it is only levity!! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|