Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 06-24-2011, 09:53 PM
Ali Fish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

removed.

Last edited by Ali Fish; 06-24-2011 at 10:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 06-24-2011, 09:54 PM
TonyD TonyD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jozi, SA
Posts: 263
Default

Thanks, team. With those blue lines fixed the only real fault I had is gone. I am sure all 69xx users are just as pleased, this really was a very pleasant surprise. Much appreciated!
__________________
I'd rather be flying ...

Gigabyte 990FXA-UD5 | AMD FX-8350 | MSI HD7970 TFOC-BE | 8GB Corsair DDR-III 1866 | Win8.1 Pro 64-bit
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 06-24-2011, 09:59 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
Because, to say clear, fixed benchmarks are stupid in some cases.

That's one thing that people have trouble to understand. The "Black Death" track don't recreate gameplay. This track has a lot of changes in views/objects, leading to a lot of texture/LOD loading that don't exist in actual gameplay. So, the average FPS and stutters is "Black Death" are massive.

I don't use fixed tracks like that to verify better gameplay performance. By the way, I'm spending my tame flying in this sim instead of talking crap about "bad performance" in this forum.
I understand that all Lobi. Btw, I'm USA and I own the game since May from JustFlight. That give me right to speak my mind here. Your videos are not convincing me to spend $1000 to upgrade only to get it to run as good as your showing me. It's not crap talk. It's just reality. This is 2011 and CLoD was 6 years in the making. This is the best??? I expected a hell of a lot better than this. You must have too!!! Come on, get a grip. Your 560 isn't cutting it. Run it and show us how it does on BD with all settings on medium. What are you afraid of? Just show us all the truth and quit the fanboy crap. Maybe dose of reality will bring you back to 46' when 3.0 goes final.
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:04 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadBlaster View Post
I understand that all Lobi. Btw, I'm USA and I own the game since May from JustFlight. That give me right to speak my mind here. Your videos are not convincing me to spend $1000 to upgrade only to get it to run as good as your showing me. It's not crap talk. It's just reality. This is 2011 and CLoD was 6 years in the making. This is the best??? I expected a hell of a lot better than this. You must have too!!! Come on, get a grip. Your 560 isn't cutting it. Run it and show us how it does on BD with all settings on medium. What are you afraid of? Just show us all the truth and quit the fanboy crap. Maybe dose of reality will bring you back to 46' when 3.0 goes final.
I'm tryng now to make FRAPS crap to work and do that... Keep calm!

FRAPS stop working in CloD after the oficial patch... another bug to people start talk... lol!
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:09 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
I'm tryng now to make FRAPS crap to work and do that... Keep calm!

FRAPS stop working in CloD after the oficial patch... another bug to people start talk... lol!

LoL. Thanx. I knew you had it in you!!!
Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:09 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

Thought you'd gone!
Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:17 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

Am I the only one missing the nice "ambient light reflections" that came with the game?

Normally when viewing parts of the aircraft that were in the shadow or "outlining" the fuselage they'd reflect sortof a blue/white light representing ambient light or the light that is reflected from the ocean/sky (not direct sunlight).

They seem to be completely missing...
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:20 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

No video yeat, but I run the BD track and had 26 FPS average, with drops to 16 FPS minimum in the big blasts in runway. Some anoying stutters when view is change, with ugly texture loadings. With these settings:

1680x1050

AA 4x
SSAO OFF
VSYNC ON

Model Detail HIGH
Buildings Detail VERY LOW
Land Detail HIGH
Forest LOW
Visual Effect MEDIUM
Texture quality ORIGINAL
Damage decals HIGH
Buildings amunt LOW
Land Shading MEDIUM

Shadows, Roads and Grass ON

But as I said, this don't tell nothing. With these settings I made a track to record after the patch "broke" FRAS here, doing straffing and bombing with a Stuka over ground with really no stutters at all, inside cockpit view. I'll try to reinstal FRAPS to do some video.
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:26 PM
LoBiSoMeM LoBiSoMeM is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadBlaster View Post
What are you afraid of? Just show us all the truth and quit the fanboy crap. Maybe dose of reality will bring you back to 46' when 3.0 goes final.
I still flying 46, but I'm tired of that:

http://www.warbirdsofprey.org/Stats_...reMkIX25lbsCLP

http://www.warbirdsofprey.org/Stats_....php?id=La-5FN

Boring sim now, planes on rails, poor engine management, just some "point and shoot" crap. Prop pitch? LOL! The old engine can't hold all the improvements we have in CloD.

I'm ok with "reality" and tired of shooting RC like planes in full real servers of 46, modded or not...



P.S. By the way, "fanboy"? I'm a MP pilot above all, hate fight AI planes - they are stupid and easy. And MP is broke as hell now in CloD... I'm just stick to the point: the PERFORMANCE in CloD now is OK! If you don't believe, isn't up to me to convince you... Believe it or not, I don't really care.

Last edited by LoBiSoMeM; 06-24-2011 at 10:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:30 PM
MadBlaster MadBlaster is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoBiSoMeM View Post
No video yeat, but I run the BD track and had 26 FPS average, with drops to 16 FPS minimum in the big blasts in runway. Some anoying stutters when view is change, with ugly texture loadings. With these settings:

1680x1050

AA 4x
SSAO OFF
VSYNC ON

Model Detail HIGH
Buildings Detail VERY LOW
Land Detail HIGH
Forest LOW
Visual Effect MEDIUM
Texture quality ORIGINAL
Damage decals HIGH
Buildings amunt LOW
Land Shading MEDIUM

Shadows, Roads and Grass ON

But as I said, this don't tell nothing. With these settings I made a track to record after the patch "broke" FRAS here, doing straffing and bombing with a Stuka over ground with really no stutters at all, inside cockpit view. I'll try to reinstal FRAPS to do some video.
Thank you for that dose of reality.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.