How much more is realistically fixable

[gwpc]

Keep the faith.. if you were around for the original release of IL2 you'd know what I mean..

I was around for the original release, in fact I had the demo the day it came out. I don't understand where this piece of inaccurate folk law about IL-2 comes from. IL-2, un-patched, was never in the state that CloD is at the moment, and it was certainly a hell of a lot more fun. Still is in fact!

[addman]

Originally Posted by gwpc

I was around for the original release, in fact I had the demo the day it came out. I don't understand where this piece of inaccurate folk law about IL-2 comes from. IL-2, un-patched, was never in the state that CloD is at the moment, and it was certainly a hell of a lot more fun. Still is in fact!

So was I and agree 102%.

[LoBiSoMeM]

The game NOW runs Ok in a HD4850 with only 512MB of VRAM.

Regards minimum decent graphics engine performance, people need NOW to shut up a little, sorry to say...

Let's move to other issues: graphic performance with all settings high and a lot of other bugs, like crashes, non-functional things, etc.

This crap about "unplayable" in terms of performance is a LIE now! Simple as that!

And if this MAJOR ISSUE is getting fixed FAST, why all other MINOR FLAWS can't be?

Originally Posted by gwpc

I was around for the original release, in fact I had the demo the day it came out. I don't understand where this piece of inaccurate folk law about IL-2 comes from. IL-2, un-patched, was never in the state that CloD is at the moment, and it was certainly a hell of a lot more fun. Still is in fact!

The beta ran better, never mind the demo.