CoD vs some other sims that model Kent?

[GloDark7]

Originally Posted by David Hayward

Not here in the real world. CoD is clearly closer to real world color, lighting, and terrain. The screenshots posted on this thread are pretty definitive. If there are screenshots showing that WoP is better, they haven't been posted here.

That's a matter of opinion. I am of the opinion that WoP is graphically superior and with a properly calibrated screen it looks incredible. Blue Scorpion posted some very good shots right here in this thread we're posting in. Superb shots.

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...2&postcount=47

Replays play back to this level of quality with high consistent fps (60fps).

I am obviously a fan. I am very impressed by it and it's level of support. FM is very good with the latest update and many aircraft are very close to historical performance test data.

It has it's short comings which the devs are aware of, but they are listening. It's a bloody good effort. A fantastic first effort. The sequel has so much potential.

I am not in a WoP loving, CoD hating camp. I have both games and want to see CoD become a success and get fixed. Presently CoD is a mess and performance is dreadful across the board. Landscapes are saturated and unnatural. It's cockpits are a thing of beauty by contrast. WoP's colours could be better than they are, but they are better than Cod.

It's only another game in a small PC genre. You like it or you don't. All this 'Wings of Puke, crap, shite'. I refuse to believe these are the utterances of an adult. What's WITH that? Your hatred of it is palpable.

Speaking of the real world, you are aware these are just games...?

Glo (with first hand experience of the English countryside)