Pentium 4 3.0Mhz , 2 Gb ram 800 Mhz ,Video card whit 500 Mb ram

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by hunter1

Becouse this sim is developed many years ago

What is your source for that nonsense? It was released a couple of weeks ago, and developed with today's PCs in mind.

software engineer make better software whit LESS resource , no better software whit enormous resource. There are many games have better effects , but run fine in my old computer P4 3.0Mhz example WoP , IL 2 1946 , H.a.w.x. , far cry , arma , crisys.

That's not correct. You are new to this forum, so I understand that you may not be fully informed on the details of this sim. IL2 was written by the same people. CoD is more detailed in every way. None of these other titles provide the historical accuracy and detail, flight and damage model that CoD provides. If you are interested in the best combat flight sim ever produced, stick around, there's a lot for you to learn here. If not, don't waste your time here, it's not for you.

Originally Posted by Avala

Actually, problem with Clod is not with the hardware. There isn't anything in there that some 2 or 3 year old PC couldn't handle.

You clearly haven't got a clue what computations the game is making to model all the AI planes etc.

Good examples with coding and optimization is Crysis, and Crysis 2 even more.

So in Crisis you can move around a map (without pausing to load as you move) that covers about 100 thousand cubic miles? And the AI are in historically accurate planes flying around that space? You might as well use Avitar as your basis for graphical comparison.