Anti-epilepsy filter?

[Feathered_IV]

I knew Ubi would fumble the release, but I never dreamed they could f *ck it up the arse to this extent.

That being said, I reckon the anti epilepsy excuse sounds like total bullish*t. Any other company would add a disclaimer in their terms and conditions that you agree too when you install. We're not getting the whole story here.

[waffen-79]

somebody post the link to the youtube video of "Hitler reacts to ubi anti-epilectic implemented in COD"

seriuosly, we have almost 20 days left, let's see if it gets sort it out

[combatdudePL]

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...9/m/6751022719

Look at the bottom of thread

[Qpassa]

I hate Ubisoft so much

do we have vids showing filter ON and OFF? I would like to know whats this all about...visually...

[T}{OR]

Originally Posted by Tvrdi

do we have vids showing filter on and OFF? I would like to know whats this all about...visually...

seconded

[Targ]

Originally Posted by combatdudePL

http://forums.ubi.com/eve/forums/a/t...9/m/6751022719

Look at the bottom of thread

Often it seems to take a week or longer for anyone to reply to her requests for information.

Let's hope we hear something much sooner.

[mazex]

The ignorance shown in this thread is really depressing.

Besides, like pointed out by Tree, Ubisoft has been doing this for ALL their titles for three years, the same goes for Sony and many other major publishers. I don't know about EA. Have you noticed bad performance in all the other titles by Ubisoft or Sony for the last three years? They apparently managed to pass the tests without loosing performance somehow, with some exceptions like Wipeout HD for PS3 that Sony stopped and sent back to the developers before releasing it for not passing the same tests we talk about here - in 2008!

http://www.computerandvideogames.com...pilepsy-tests/

I sure hope that MG can address their performance issues, just like the other developers have done.

[Targ]

Originally Posted by mazex

The ignorance shown in this thread is really depressing.

Besides, like pointed out by Tree, Ubisoft has been doing this for ALL their titles for three years, the same goes for Sony and many other major publishers. I don't know about EA. Have you noticed bad performance in all the other titles by Ubisoft or Sony for the last three years? They apparently managed to pass the tests without loosing performance somehow.

I sure hope that MG can address their performance issues, just like the other developers have done.

I assume you have a link with some good information backing this claim up? Or is it that we are simply to ignorant for you to provide some links to back your claim up?

[mazex]

Originally Posted by Targ

I assume you have a link with some good information backing this claim up? Or is it that we are simply to ignorant for you to provide some links to back your claim up?

Edited my post above with a link, you can sure find more yourself - my guess about the reason there are not so many to find are because this is handled internally, who would like to post stuff like that in public? I guess MANY developers have got their games back to re engineer them the last three years - but WHY would the developers or the publishers want to make that a public discussion like this? It sure as hell strikes back at themselves (both parties).