Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

View Poll Results: Moderators in the weekly update threads.
Moderators should intervene more in the update threads 194 70.80%
Moderators should intervene less in the update threads 11 4.01%
The present work of moderators is just fine 69 25.18%
Voters: 274. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 11-25-2010, 09:17 PM
major_setback's Avatar
major_setback major_setback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lund Sweden
Posts: 1,415
Default

I always find it ridiculous that aggravating posters aren't banned for several weeks.
I'm sure that no-one really would care if such a small penalty was dealt out.
Ban me if you disagree!! I really couldn't care any less.

I'll be back in a few weeks if I feel like it.

Really; just put a lock on anyone who is getting away from the topic.

Please!
__________________
All CoD screenshots here:
http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/

__________


Flying online as Setback.
  #122  
Old 11-26-2010, 05:23 AM
Rodolphe's Avatar
Rodolphe Rodolphe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 208
Default

...


Quote:
Originally Posted by KOM.Nausicaa View Post
Second, people should be warned progressively and clearly visible in their own posts with fat red moderator letters if needed. Then, in steps, 3 days "in the box", 1 week, one month, and finally permanent ban. Sentences like "that terrain looks like painted by a child with watercolors" for example is enough for a first 3 days in the box. That is my personal opinion.
KOM.Nausicaa, I really like to know what's your personal opinion and your proposal ban for the following typical rude, insulting The Community and most racist posting I've ever seen on a simulation forum.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nausicaa
Well, I read all that, but I rest my case. It really bla bla, without interest, like "I'm the arrogant French and German is an asshole anyway."

Fuc*k you ... frenchie!

That's it for me - I found this forum really extremely unpleasant arrogant. Very French (so to speak.)

Hello guys bye bye.


http://www.checksix-forums.com/showp...&postcount=980


Edit : Spelling
...

Last edited by Rodolphe; 11-26-2010 at 05:30 AM.
  #123  
Old 11-26-2010, 05:50 AM
fireflyerz fireflyerz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: All over the world...
Posts: 417
Default

lol
  #124  
Old 11-26-2010, 09:04 AM
McHilt McHilt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 117
Default

OT posts are annoying, but one has to be realistic. Everybody posts a couple of OT lines every now and then, like a joke or sth else irrelevant to the actual subject. I have no prob with that at all. Personally I hate all the whining and wishlists, but I also hate posts that could make up a short novel and take 20 mins to plow through, even if they're on topic they're annoying just as well in my humble opinion.

I'd say: stick to the subject, crack an OT joke every now and then, keep it short and simple, stop whining and wishing and enjoy what's given by the great Oleg and team, even if you don't like it...

and yes, real spam = ban
  #125  
Old 11-26-2010, 09:26 AM
McHilt McHilt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
If I did dream of stopping any posts, it would be all of the above without exception.

I actually voted the current moderation right, because I think it is, and I wouldn't want to see anything changed.

The elimination of the "this bit might be a bit wrong, perhaps?" posts to concentrate on the butt-kissing ones would entirely remove the point of the update threads for me.
Ok, the only input I always give here is my appreciation, which is considered just as tedious by some members. Maybe we have to shut up completely unless you're a highly intellectual insider with extremely valuable knowledge on the subject who has sth important and interesting to say, is that what you want to point out?. It would be an elitist place, reserved for the ones who are 'in the know' (whatever that means)... now, what is that???
  #126  
Old 11-26-2010, 12:03 PM
HFC_Dolphin HFC_Dolphin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 340
Default

It would be fantastic if we could all make only useful and to the point discussions!

There could always be "Off" topics if some people wanted to have some fun or discuss BS, but this discussion would not interfere with update threads where we look for usefull stuff.
  #127  
Old 11-26-2010, 12:09 PM
HFC_Dolphin HFC_Dolphin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 340
Default

lolol right after I posted this I went to see today's update thread and it's full of useless posts lolol

PS. I have no problem with these posts or the people who posted them. I'm just saying that they're useless.
  #128  
Old 11-26-2010, 01:28 PM
kristorf's Avatar
kristorf kristorf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 897
Default

Answers relevant to the topic are fine, but as on several other sites the update thread usually degenerates into a slagging match between a few (usual) posters who appear to use the forum as a personal zone.
__________________
Regards

Chris



http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php





Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU,
GTX580 3gb OC
  #129  
Old 11-26-2010, 01:54 PM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McHilt View Post
Ok, the only input I always give here is my appreciation, which is considered just as tedious by some members. Maybe we have to shut up completely unless you're a highly intellectual insider with extremely valuable knowledge on the subject who has sth important and interesting to say, is that what you want to point out?. It would be an elitist place, reserved for the ones who are 'in the know' (whatever that means)... now, what is that???
Nobody knows everything. Everybody knows something. If somebody knows something relevant, they should tell us about it (but not if they know everybody else knows it too).

I take the view that Mr Maddox shows us details because he is kind, and because we might spot something that can be improved.

It might be, that of the thousands viewing an image, only one will spot some detail, so it is the duty of the first to spot something to speak up. There is very little point to being the second to mention a detail that might be questionable.

Mostly, we don't know how easy or not it would be to fix a point of detail, it might be a couple of characters in the code, it might be a million lines of code, with code unless you know the particular code intimately, there's often no telling.

So, we can point to possible changes, but we have to accept that the final decision on whether a change can be made is not ours.
  #130  
Old 11-26-2010, 03:31 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall View Post
I think that the moderation level in this forum is about right. There are only 2 or 3 member's who are abusing the system, and spaming the up-date thread with junk each week...we should turn the table on them, by spaming their PM folder with request to cease and desist.
I think the overall moderation here is good.. but in some of these update threads I see stuff that just shouldn't be there... When Oleg points out in the first thread that he is aware of a bug or that the shots are pre beta or taken at a lower res etc.. and then we get googobs of posts pointing out the bug or the quality of the shots .. that Oleg mentioned in his initial post.. to me tat is a waste of space.. Some people just look to find flaws and point them out.. and while I am sure that 1C is appreciative of things pointed out by users that they may miss... all this is unfinished.. so I find it kind of annoying at times that folks just can't appreciate the update for it's own sake.. and wait until the sim is at least nearer to completion or even released in a demo before the critics come out of the woodwork.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.