![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: do you know flugwerk company a her real one fockewulf a8? | |||
yes |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 33.33% |
no |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 66.67% |
Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Apparently "Planes of Fame" thinks the reverse is more plausible. It's only a 1.3 second implausibility mind you, but then they come up with the P-47D: 27 seconds best turn time... Bf-109G: 22 seconds... So what did KG 200 mean when they said "The P-47D out-turns our Bf-109G?" ("On Special Missions: KG 200") That was with an underpowered needle-tip prop P-47D Razorback by the way: Same exact thing as the Russians had... If they can get it wrong by more than FIVE whole seconds, then why could the FW-190A not just as easily be at 18 seconds? In the real world, the Front-Line Russians found the Spitfire Mk V so inadequate for turn-fighting they changed their tactics to dive and zoom just for its benefit, and they even tried to remove its outer guns to help it turn, to no avail... (Source: Le Fana de l'Aviation #496 p.40.) The Spitfire Mk IX was in fact no better for turns and probably slightly worse... So what I am asking you is to cite here your reasons for choosing the Russian test values over the KG 200 evaluation conclusion: Insert reasons here: _________________________________________ Mind you all 600 P-47D combat reports here are completely on the German side, with no exceptions...: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.o...r-reports.html Insert Reasons for ignoring them here:___________________________. My reason for ignoring the Russian turn rate values is they have no counterparts in real life combat for the heavier types... Ever. And that shows an apparent bias that is understandable, but still a bias. Mystery of mysteries, the bias completely disapears when bullets are flying... Gaston Last edited by Gaston; 10-04-2012 at 07:45 AM. |
|
|