![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi guys
Something I have noticed time and again when reporting on patches is that some people are often very vague with their information, or that the info is not presented in a decent manner. For example, someone might say something like "AA is working now I think", but that's not very helpful at all. Is it 2x, 4x, or 8x AA? Is it actually working or not? Another example may be "I get 30 fps over land" but at what height, and at what settings? Is it over a town or a forest? Or they may just say that the latest patch is better or worse than the last one. Okay, but in which way exactly is it better or worse? We need to present the info in a logical and orderly manner, so that the devs don't have to rummage through vague posts that don't offer anything really useful. Imo, we need to set up a standardised format of reporting back on beta and official patches, and maybe include results from a particular benchmark as well. (Like the black death track.) What about something like this: Positives Blah blah blah Negatives blah blah blah Benchmark for black death track blah blah blah. |
|
|