![]() |
#131
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I keep seeing messages on the text bar saying that aircraft have been shot down by flak.
I protest. There is obviously too much flak above the bases. |
#132
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#133
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I want to say first that I would not like to see any artificial restrictions on how players are to "fly". Rules as shown in other servers like puting bonfires near an airfield and stating that the next 5 square miles is off limits for attacking IMHO is unrealistic and a large impact on the suspension of disbelief. I support ATAG's general approach to their server. I do have opinions though, as do others, on possible ways to alleviate some issues. So switching to bombers and attacking bombers; I do so love the challenge of the hunt for those bombers that are human piloted. Many times I pass up the AI bomber flights in my quest to locate the human flown bomber. I have to think about what targets are available in England, what type the bomber is, what will be the pilots strategy, what will be his tactics to realize his strategy and so forth. Many times I have been in one place on the map to find the target at the other end of the map is being bombed. I sometimes take a flight to where I know the bombers take off from in the hopes of seeing one inbound or outbound. I refrain from attacking any bombers on the ground but would rather catch them in the air. Doc has successfully evaded me by flying through the cloud layers. I've learned the possible routes and set up barcaps in the general area they may cross. The bomber pilots are now wise to this and are taking other routes. Also, with the addition of high altitude bombing, the barcap becomes more problematic. What I would suggest for the ATAG server regarding bombers flights would be to: Open up a few more blue airbases where the heavies can take off from. I know the two main blue bases now and the moment I see a heavy in the net stats list, I'm heading to intercept before the pilot has got his engines started. More airfields makes it harder for me to figure out where the attack is coming from. I would also like to see a couple of more airbases for the Red side for Blenheim flights. I don't think that Blue heavies take off from coastal airfields and having a Blenheim base on the coast and in close proximity to furball city Hawkinge, is somewhat problematic. Perhaps even discouraging some to even try to fly the Blenheim to targets. Could you assign valid targets for some blue airfield hangars for reds to attack as this would be somewhat historic. Even deep into France. So Keller and other Blue Bomber pilots, I do enjoy the hunt for you guys and will continue to do so as best I can. Hopefully some tweaks might help to improve Blue bomber odds for making it across the channel. But, when you reach the shores of Old Blighty - all bets are off. ![]() Looking forward to future "Cat" and Mouse games. S! and good flying! |
#134
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Real astute, constructive response to my observation there. And I'm the one getting ganged up on for being a troll.
|
#135
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
How bout them apples? |
#136
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If a red pilot and a blue pilot had sex, would they have a purple baby?
__________________
|
#137
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's racist.
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They would have a miracle as I don't know any female pilots, blue or red.
|
#139
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Only if the purple baby wasnt allowed to play on the ATAG server....
__________________
|
#140
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Cats, good input re more/widely spaced heavy bomber fields for both sides. Even if the physical placements are too problematic at present with the current map and FMB quirks (don't know, just sayin'), we could possibly look at different air start locales instead as a temporary work around.
I just didn't like your accusatory tone, is all. J/K ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
|
|