Do we need new trees? - Page 3

Insuber · #21 10-15-2011, 12:22 PM

No one Tree is enough ...

T}{OR · #22 10-15-2011, 01:53 PM

Voted yes because of no collision model.

#23 10-15-2011, 02:15 PM

yeah, we need collision model for trees more than we need new trees....

sport02 · #24 10-15-2011, 02:40 PM

collision model + more than one type of trees ( different type of trees and shrub or bush should be interesting for diversity )

always the same trees on all the map is monotone

i think it' s lake that choice in your option answers

Osprey · #25 10-15-2011, 02:49 PM

Turn the trees off if you don't like them.

#26 10-15-2011, 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osprey

Turn the trees off if you don't like them.

yeah thats a solution...cinics

klem · #27 10-15-2011, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osprey

Turn the trees off if you don't like them.

you might as well, they don't do anything except hog resources and hide 109s

the Dutchman · #28 10-15-2011, 04:01 PM

We need old trees,new trees grow very slowly..........

Zorin · #29 10-15-2011, 06:02 PM

Do vehicles drive straight through trees?

Kankkis · #30 10-15-2011, 06:14 PM

Allmost all there is saying the game performance is bad, yes it is, but if we get collision on the trees i'm sure it not boost performance.

View Poll Results: Do we need new trees?
Yes, current ones are glittering and have no collision model.	71	47.65%
No, but the collison model added.	60	40.27%
No, they are fine.	8	5.37%
Don't mind the trees.	10	6.71%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll