Do we need new trees?
 

Do we need new trees?

These are them from Rise of flight including damage model:

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a23...-Flight_29.jpg

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a23...-Flight_16.jpg

No, they are fine.
Maybe when all bugs/problems are solved, but not at the moment IMHO

Tree's having no collision model is a bit awkward of course, but I wouldn't consider it top priority at the moment.
It's till tweaking and performance they have to focus on and having collision models on trees only slows the game down. :(

yes.

these are a performance whore, little overdone, and give a very poor impression of florest areas, tough they look fine by themselfs.

we also need bushes, headgrows and all that stuiff missing from england.

oh! and colissions!

Yes. Overall they´re fine, but the array is funny, that´s not much England IMHO.

It's much better have nice trees without colision mesh.

In the past we had INVISIBLE trees WITH colision mesh...

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y14...2733878503.gif

I would like to say that I am from Britain and unlike the majority of my fellow country men I could not care less about hedgerows, yes they would make it look more like the UK but would they improve the FLIGHT sim... not one iota.

Thanks for your time....

I would like to say im from portugal and likewise you i have an opinion who happens to be different from yours, visuals improve the FLIGHT sim otherwise we would have stayed with 1946 with a CEM remoddeling.

i would fix a smiley for you, but i dont want to be rude.

have a nice day.

less trees and collison model

Less complex trees and a lot more of them. They look terrible from a distance.

They don't 'glitter'.