What is best way to contact Oleg and his team ?

[KG26_Alpha]

Originally Posted by BOBC

I also see in the Promo video that the Stuka has a yellow fuselage band and wing undersides, it is a well known fact that this is a later war marking and not Battle of Britain. There are ample references on stukas in the Battle so its worrying who is reading what before doing the work.

BOBC

You missed the Bf109G in the promo vid too then.

Just because there's errors, bugs etc etc in the update and promo vids, does not necessarily mean its in the release version.

[TheGrunch]

So what you're saying is if we ever see an error, it's probably already been fixed and there's no need to mention it because the development team are infallible.

I can't believe some of you guys. This thread is about constructive criticism, and you've turned it into a flamewar out of pure fanboyism.

[BOBC]

Can anyone post images of what is known to be CoD's Mk1 spitfire cockpit. Do the preflight settings carefully to be sure ! To include the pedals and seat, side walls etc. Now that its available, lets see if what they had out there was a Mk2 as was suggested. It was said to wait and judge upon release, that time has now come.

BOBC

[MrR0ket0]

Originally Posted by swiss

OMG!!!

First no DX11, and now a yellow band on Stuka plus a wrong switch in Spit.
I am sooooo NOT GOING to buy this sim!!!!!!!!!!

I mean, how could anyone enjoy this sim with a flaw in the markings or wrong switch?
Tell me!!!!!



You guys are so ridiculous, really.

Do you have a clue how many unfinished/unstable games were released in the past (not only Flightsims)? Besides, why do you make such a statement in a forum for a game that you dont own? We all waited long for this game to be released and now since its out theres still alot to do for the game and its up to us to be patient to wait for patches been released!
sry just my 2 cents

[Redroach]

I love it when someone picks up on someone's sarcasm! Swiss wins the day!

Originally Posted by BOBC

Can anyone post images of what is known to be CoD's Mk1 spitfire cockpit. Do the preflight settings carefully to be sure ! To include the pedals and seat, side walls etc. Now that its available, lets see if what they had out there was a Mk2 as was suggested. It was said to wait and judge upon release, that time has now come.

BOBC

what...has...just...happened?!?

[No145_Hatter]

Originally Posted by BOBC

It was said to wait and judge upon release, that time has now come.

I am genuinely uneasy. It sounds so serious.

[BOBC]

MrR0Ket0...its up to us to be patient to wait for patches been released!

Quite right. However patches cannot be made without developers knowing what needs patching ! As this thread was about the fact that the pre release spit Mk1 cockpit was a MkV, it then was said lets wait and see whats in the release, it may be that its a Mkll they are showing. So we did. This was simply a request to see now if the Mk1 cockpit is a Mk1. If it isnt then feedback can be given to allow a patch to be worked on sometime. This is for those who in this and other threads expressed a desire to fly a Mk1 cockpit. There are also those that dont care if its a MkV or a IX or a XX, thats ok, their choice, but then they also want to deny those that do care the chance to see such corrected if it turns out to be a Mk1 as well as the Mkll in the actual release.
Simple polite request..can someone post images of what we see when selecting Mk1.
Then feedback can begin if needed, for those that do care.
BOBC

[MadTommy]

Originally Posted by BOBC

Quite right. However patches cannot be made without developers knowing what needs patching ! As this thread was about the fact that the pre release spit Mk1 cockpit was a MkV, it then was said lets wait and see whats in the release, it may be that its a Mkll they are showing. So we did. This was simply a request to see now if the Mk1 cockpit is a Mk1. If it isnt then feedback can be given to allow a patch to be worked on sometime. This is for those who in this and other threads expressed a desire to fly a Mk1 cockpit. There are also those that dont care if its a MkV or a IX or a XX, thats ok, their choice, but then they also want to deny those that do care the chance to see such corrected if it turns out to be a Mk1 as well as the Mkll in the actual release.
Simple polite request..can someone post images of what we see when selecting Mk1.
Then feedback can begin if needed, for those that do care.
BOBC

So i take it you don't own CoD? But you want the models to be perfect right?

I think the DEVs have bigger fish to fry than fixing rivet locations. Give them some time to fix the burning issues that is stopping people actually playing the game, then i suggest you take up your campaign to get each dial & rivet n the right location, I'd suggest a year or so.

[Kikuchiyo]

Historical accuracy is important, but right now the devs main focus should be on the performance and implementation of more important issues than whether a gauge or rivet is in the right place on a cockpit/external model. I'd say they are indeed focusing on the most important issues atm. Let's get performance and implementation of things like head tracking, force feed back, and sli/xfire fixed before we worry about the minute details please.

[mattag08]

Originally Posted by MrR0ket0

Do you have a clue how many unfinished/unstable games were released in the past (not only Flightsims)? Besides, why do you make such a statement in a forum for a game that you dont own? We all waited long for this game to be released and now since its out theres still alot to do for the game and its up to us to be patient to wait for patches been released!
sry just my 2 cents

That was sarcasm. It's pretty obvious English isn't your first language by your post, so just understand that he wasn't being serious. He was making a joke about how people are picking on little things instead of focusing on the big issues.