Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-02-2011, 05:00 AM
The Kraken The Kraken is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Or maybe you saw a good example of the new video tool, that allows you to sticth together footage without any FPS drop.
That's entirely possible, but still invalidates your previous claims that the absence of such videos would somehow prove a lack in performance.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-02-2011, 05:04 AM
The Kraken The Kraken is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heliocon View Post
No not really, there marketing is pathetic. I canceled my pre-order, going to let them test the game on you poor sods first...

-People dont buy promises.
Well I never preorder games, but I'm also not "poor" enough to worry about the price of a video game. And hey, I like most of what I've seen so it looks like a safe bet to me. But to each his own!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-02-2011, 10:30 AM
Heliocon Heliocon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Kraken View Post
Well I never preorder games, but I'm also not "poor" enough to worry about the price of a video game. And hey, I like most of what I've seen so it looks like a safe bet to me. But to each his own!
Well its not the price - its the time investment, but overtime I have spent way to much $ on crap games because I pre-orderd and should of waited.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-02-2011, 11:58 AM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

personally i think the trailers we see are quite lame, they are just re-jumbled footage of old trailers and they are a miss match of really old footage, no new footage what so ever, no sound which for me is making me feel quite apprehensive to be honest.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-02-2011, 12:21 PM
ckolonko ckolonko is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 58
Default

I have to agree BigPickle.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-02-2011, 12:41 PM
fireflyerz fireflyerz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: All over the world...
Posts: 417
Default

Lame aint the half of it.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-02-2011, 01:49 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
personally i think the trailers we see are quite lame, they are just re-jumbled footage of old trailers and they are a miss match of really old footage, no new footage what so ever, no sound which for me is making me feel quite apprehensive to be honest.
Quite egocentric view. Who said this clip was made for us hard-core fans? Remember, this is the first official trailer of the distributor, not a dev-update.

It's ment to include basic information and act as a teaser for people unaware of the simulation. It's meant to raise interest amongst and draw new customers. That's exactly what it does. For this purpose the movie, the shots and the informations given is excellent.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-02-2011, 04:27 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I hear you yeah, but my point is this, 1C has given out so very little footage that even the publishers have clearly had to use old footage.
Thats not great stratergy from 1C to be fair but also why the publishers havent specifically asked or been sent some new footage to advertise the game seems strange.
I thought that 1C wanted to attract new customers and have designed the sim thus far to accomodate both fans and newcomers. Also my reasoning behind my egocentric view is if it is a basic broad view to attract people, why is it only in Russian? or why is it only on the internet?

The sim itself will as IL2 has always done attract new commers, so I think that they are possibly going to use the advertise after release apporach - hence making the video a waste of money. If they are not going for that apporach then the video is still lame as it doesnt show anything new that advertises the game compared the the 1C trailer.

Last edited by BigPickle; 03-02-2011 at 04:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-02-2011, 05:46 PM
Feuerfalke Feuerfalke is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
I hear you yeah, but my point is this, 1C has given out so very little footage that even the publishers have clearly had to use old footage.
That again is entirely your speculation. Why waste so much manpower from Olegs small team to make some movie or a protected demo-version to give to somebody else, while there is already so much movie-content?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
Thats not great stratergy from 1C to be fair but also why the publishers havent specifically asked or been sent some new footage to advertise the game seems strange.
1. It's not 1Cs campaign alone. This is also the campaign from UBISOFT.
2. See above.
3. If they don't know the game, how can they make specific requests? You assume there is a flight-sim-pro making the movies. Given how many simulation-fans there are, I'd rather expect a very slim chance for that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
I thought that 1C wanted to attract new customers and have designed the sim thus far to accomodate both fans and newcomers. Also my reasoning behind my egocentric view is if it is a basic broad view to attract people, why is it only in Russian? or why is it only on the internet?
Because 1C and UBISOFT are two different companies. And UBISOFT has other priorities in their gaming market than 1C. And their ideas might be something completely different from Maddox Games. So connecting all three differing ideas in one argument doesn't work out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
The sim itself will as IL2 has always done attract new commers, so I think that they are possibly going to use the advertise after release apporach - hence making the video a waste of money.
That, my friend, answers all your above questions Why was even more time and money?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
If they are not going for that apporach then the video is still lame as it doesnt show anything new that advertises the game compared the the 1C trailer.
It doesn't need to.

As posted above, one trailer is the official announcement from 1C, one is the official announcement of UBISOFT. Considering NDAs and marketing strategy, here you give yourself another reason why both share the same scenes: They were most likely the only ones available for both companies.

If at all I'd assume this was bad timing. If both videos were released in parallel, it would have been even more obvious. Maybe even obvious enough for nay-sayers

Last edited by Feuerfalke; 03-02-2011 at 05:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-02-2011, 10:28 PM
Heliocon Heliocon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuerfalke View Post
That again is entirely your speculation. Why waste so much manpower from Olegs small team to make some movie or a protected demo-version to give to somebody else, while there is already so much movie-content?



1. It's not 1Cs campaign alone. This is also the campaign from UBISOFT.
2. See above.
3. If they don't know the game, how can they make specific requests? You assume there is a flight-sim-pro making the movies. Given how many simulation-fans there are, I'd rather expect a very slim chance for that.



Because 1C and UBISOFT are two different companies. And UBISOFT has other priorities in their gaming market than 1C. And their ideas might be something completely different from Maddox Games. So connecting all three differing ideas in one argument doesn't work out.



That, my friend, answers all your above questions Why was even more time and money?



It doesn't need to.

As posted above, one trailer is the official announcement from 1C, one is the official announcement of UBISOFT. Considering NDAs and marketing strategy, here you give yourself another reason why both share the same scenes: They were most likely the only ones available for both companies.

If at all I'd assume this was bad timing. If both videos were released in parallel, it would have been even more obvious. Maybe even obvious enough for nay-sayers
Because all we damn want is 5 minutes of fraps footage of a ingame dogfight? Are you seriously going to say they have never even played a scenario? Because its really bloody easy to just record a fight, release it as a commentary video (just say this is a taster, its from the beta and not indicative of the finished product) and post it here. Really easy, lots of other devs do it.

Then again other devs bother to actually give some interviews/trailers/shows in the majority language of their market which is English. Yes its made in Russia, but the sales it will make outside of Russia are more then inside...
I have seen much smaller dev studios give MUCH more and better feedback/info.
-Mount and Blade (2 person dev team from Turkey, now its like 30 ppl)
-Mortal online (Small sweedish team, but you could chat often with the devs in the forums and in game).
Eu3/V2 games (sweedish again and like 10 person team).

You know that doesnt matter - what matters is that they need to sell copies of COD. I have no right to tell them what to do, or demand anything. But if they want a supporting fanbase/community that requires communication and is normally one of if not the top priority for indie developers. Because the people who carry the game at release and keep it around to be fleshed out and to attract "new" players are the hardcore fans.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.