![]() |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Er...do you think Oleg got angry?
Last edited by bf-110; 11-10-2010 at 12:22 AM. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
angry about what?
What are you talking about |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That was more than quite impressive!
But S-55 is too late for WWII... |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
To tell you the truth i don't know what her political beliefs were, but she didn't come off that way to me. What i saw was an old lady who had done some pretty impressive stuff in her day and even in her old age being enthusiastic about aviation and technology. I don't know if she was a member of the party but simply flight testing some stuff doesn't make her an accomplice, just like explaining relativity doesn't make Einstein responsible for Hiroshima. The way it usually happens is that scientists, engineers and testers collaborate to give us all sorts of useful new things that the governments will later use in the wrong way, usually to kill each other off ![]() Also, the general she refers to was Ernst Udet. I think he was not a member of the nazi party, or at least was a secret objector to the regime, as he ended up taking his own life in 1941 or thereabouts. It's the same Ernst Udet that started flying in WWI at the age of 16, became an ace and survived the war, toured the US in the 30s giving aerobatic and aviation performances and so on. Come to think of it, a guy who has lived such an interesting and accomplished life and managed to defy death in so many occasions, must have been either terribly depressed or very disagreeable to the way things were being done to end up commiting suicide. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hanna Reitsch was hardly an innocent 'scientist, engineer or tester' during the Third Reich:
Quote:
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We can make a long list of justifications for including
these beautiful birds in WWII The S55 = korea ![]() S! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flettner_Fl_282 http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/...ttner-282.html @ Oleg Oleg sorry for talking about these birds modeled, is that I enjoy many of these birds in flight simulator. As many as IL2 or Stuka If you're upset I delete my answers. Greetings Off topic Boys Do not deface this topic with discussions that do not correspond. Greetings Last edited by GAE_Charrua; 11-11-2010 at 11:38 PM. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You guys know that helicopters didnt play any significant role in ww2??
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am I the only one here who remembers that Oleg said that SOW's engine is made in such a way as to include coding for technology that is modern?
What I mean is that I seem to remember him using 'Nam and even some modern tech as examples of what the engine is capable of, so I'm crossing my fingers that I some day will be able to get an order to skim the treetops in my AH-1W Cobra from my flightleader ![]() A Sandy, F-4 and a couple of Mig's would keep me busy for quite a while, but flying an AH would be really REALLY cool if the series ever goes to 'Nam ![]() |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is actually much more likely than the jets (much less avionics etc.)
My own guess is that Oleg and is programmers wanted to try pushing their flight model and thought it would be fun to have something that goes "whirrrrr". Autogyros just happen to fit the correct time period. It is interesting that my guess about the A-7 being a possibility for SoW:BoM appears to be right (although Oleg has only hinted that it might not be inappropriate for the map). |
![]() |
|
|