Force Feedback poll ...

[Lensman_1]

Hello.

Firstly please don't accuse me of complaining. I'm a bit surprised that Force Feedback is not included in this application as it was in IL-2 and I would dearly love to see it reinstated but the purpose of this post is to create a poll that might clarify to the developers how much priority this should have. Please, if you value FF then say so and likewise if you do not. I think FF is essential for immersion and certainly so if you've been using it for 10 years with IL-2 like a lot of us have. Speaking purely for myself (and the others that have expressed a desire on the other FF thread) I'd be extremely grateful if FF could be added to the future development schedule as a priority after getting the application running smoothly.

EDIT:

ASAP in the poll question means as soon as possible AFTER getting the application running smoothly. Sorry, I thought that was obvious but clearly I didn't make it so.

[Strike]

Although I have a FFB setup and would like to use it I think there are more important matters the developers need to focus on now.

[Kankkis]

Performance issues my priority nro.1 of course

Kankkis

[Triggaaar]

Originally Posted by Strike

Although I have a FFB setup and would like to use it I think there are more important matters the developers need to focus on now.

I agree, so I'm not voting, as I would like it soon, but I know they have other things to to.

[ICDP]

You worded the question in such a way as to polarise the voting. If you had simply said:

"Should Force Feedback be added to COD?

You would not have got people thinking, "oh he wants the developers to work on this rather tan other more important things, I'm voting no".

I suggest reword the question if possible, don't make it a demand but a request.

[kimosabi]

FFS I need my FFB. WTH am I supposed to do without FFB FFS?

[TheEditor]

Ok maybe not asap but would like sometime.

[gprr]

Was willing to have all of the incompleteness of the game and Steam !!!
But no FF is is a NO-GO for me
All the recent joysticks purchased in ny country fellows, were G940 and most IL2 community owns FF ones !!!

GP

[Azimech]

Indeed. First the other problems, then FFB. But I voted yes anyway. I feel it's more important than a real weather/cloud system, more planes or more campaigns.

[Blackdog_kt]

Originally Posted by Strike

Although I have a FFB setup and would like to use it I think there are more important matters the developers need to focus on now.

I don't have FFB, i want you guys to have FFB since you obviously like it, but i'll go with the above quote.

I won't vote no because that's just mean, it's a useful feature for many.

I won't vote yes either, due to the "ASAP" part and the sense of urgency it conveys.

My opinion is FFB should be added when practically possible. Priority should be given to optimizations that are game critical and most of all, have an effect to all players.

For example, my trackIR 4 stopped working a while ago and i would like to have support for alternative head tracking solutions so that i won't be forced to buy a new one right away. However, i won't demand they give it top priority when there's other more important things like stutters to fix. I hope i'm making sense, i'm not attacking the viewpoint that FFB should be there, i just think there are bigger fish to fry currently