![]() |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's a great question. Personally, I think multi-GPU performance lies with the technology of the hardware makers, not the game developers. Otherwise how is it that, as you say, "even most recent game releases only show a marginal FPS increase when running dual/triple/quad setups."(?) Lucid's Hydra hardware shows promise at scaling multiple GPUs to nearly 100% regardless of software (games). Neither Crossfire nor SLi do that at present (claim that sort of scaling regardless of the game title). Again, personally speaking, I'd rather go the better-value route and buy a good single GPU. Both major card companies hype the multi-GPU solution. But it's just that: marketing hype. I doubt you'll see anyone respond here stating that they went SLi or Crossfire and doubled their FPS in IL2 or in any recent games. Too much on the web to show otherwise. There's lots of discussion about this. I searched "SLi and Crossfire", and here's the results of that search: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/search.php?searchid=464915 here's one that is most recent (please read the sections on "Power consumption & Cost", and the "Conclusion": http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...ssfire_vs_sli/ If nothing else, it's not on Oleg, as I said. Flyby out
__________________
the warrior creed: crap happens to the other guy! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Many calls of "No joy" with multi-GPU usage. I think you'll find the same for LOMAC and IL2. Flyby out
__________________
the warrior creed: crap happens to the other guy! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Check your PM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Postings in this thread are moved mostly from Oleg Maddox#2 THREAD.
The Oleg Maddox # 2 thread is for questions to Oleg, ONLY. Make what you can of these moved postings would be the best suggestion. Last edited by nearmiss; 05-10-2009 at 12:08 PM. |
![]() |
|
|