Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-09-2012, 03:38 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default Huricane Mk I 100 Octane perormance tests 1.07.18301

Here are my results taken from my Flight Data script and converted to Excel/OO charts.

I have done the basic Level Speed and Climb tests and extracted some other info.

Level Speed: Anywhere from 80%-90% below historical data.
Climb: 130% to 180% slower to height than Historical data.


Other:
R.O.C.: Falls away form near-historical above 5000 ft. Bad at 15000 ft (about 35% of historical). Excuse my up and down ROC but its clearly wrong.

"Boost": Does not respond to Boost Cutout Override. Two data sets emerge. One is the gauge reading (Manifold Pressure) which never gets above 6.2lbs and another which does not appear in the cockpit is the Boost C# parameter for Boost rather than Manifold Pressure and ranges from 8.8 through 11.1 and back to 8.1. Not clear which is driving performance (if either)

Max Speed at SL achieved at 2650-2670 RPM

Thumbnails attached.
Mission zip file Performance.zip attached for anyone wanting to do some tests themselves. I can explain the chart building of you need.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HurricaneMkI_100oct_LevelSpeed_1.07.18301.jpg (560.0 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg HurricaneMkI_100oct_Climb_1.07.18301.jpg (361.4 KB, 42 views)
File Type: jpg HurricaneMkI_100oct_ROC_1.07.18301.jpg (318.5 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg HurricaneMkI_100oct_Boost_MP_vsAltitude_1.07.18301.jpg (226.4 KB, 30 views)
Attached Files
File Type: zip Performance.zip (1.68 MB, 9 views)
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 07-10-2012 at 09:20 AM. Reason: Performance.zip added with revised instructions document
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-09-2012, 04:00 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

When was that admitted that the Merlin delivered 12lb boost in 1940 ?

lol

Ok let me try your scientific sense of history....

I dated Jenny Lopez... I dated Jenny Lopez... I dated Jenny Lopez... I dated Jenny Lopez... I dated Jenny Lopez...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-09-2012, 04:31 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
When was that admitted that the Merlin delivered 12lb boost in 1940 ?
When was it approved for sustained climbs?????
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2012, 04:51 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Please explain the chart building and how to do this. I would not mind doing this for the 109, cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2012, 05:20 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
When was that admitted that the Merlin delivered 12lb boost in 1940 ?
In 1940 you joker

Great test klem, thanks for the effort.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-09-2012, 05:24 PM
TomcatViP TomcatViP is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
Default

you might reset your clock then.

... and check your language
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-09-2012, 08:41 PM
=AN=Felipe =AN=Felipe is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Thx Klem briliant test!

I dont know how to program so i do that manualy, anyway, nice work!

Im glad to see you guys are testing too!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-09-2012, 11:23 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Great test Klem Thanks for the effort.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-10-2012, 03:24 AM
Seadog Seadog is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 226
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
When was it approved for sustained climbs?????
It was approved for 5mins at 12lb boost/3000rpm in 1940, and it was up to the pilots on how and when to use the power; including sustained climbs:



and:

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-10-2012, 05:04 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

But Seadog, Crumpp says the Pilot's handbook says nothing about 12lb boost.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.