I like this Sim/Game (New Vid)

[Axel]

I know it has it's problems.

Not everyone has a beefy rig etc BUT if you're borderline and can hang on a bit the potential here is off the hook.

I am reading here (and SimHQ) and seeing so much negativity and that's fine btw. If it doesn't work on your machine and your well within recommended specs you're entitled to feel aggrieved.

Saying that, if Luthier can do it then there is a lot of game play to come.

I made this vid to show that it's not all doom and gloom.

God help me, I haven't a clue about Video editing so it's just to show good Gameplay in a big mission and not to show fancy movie skills or fancy flying.
I specifically left on loads of cloud as I know a lot of peeps seem to have a problem with that. Sorry for really bad editing
I keep reading, "get more than 1 plane over London and you can forget it" So I'm going to prove that statement wrong.

Settings were pretty much all highest but trees are low (makes no difference really but I think to many just looks wrong} and houses were on medium

The mission is the standard 'Intercept the Bombers over London' that ships with the game. I have to be honest and I don't think it's set in the heart of London though but it's close!

It has around 20+ Aircraft, yea it's not BoB levels but it gives you an idea and to be honest it was damn fun.

Anyway, it might even be a revelation to some as the game is VERY playable. cheers

http://vimeo.com/21823687

[paper]

Originally Posted by Axel

I know it has it's problems.

Not everyone has a beefy rig etc BUT if you're borderline and can hang on a bit the potential here is off the hook.

I am reading here (and SimHQ) and seeing so much negativity and that's fine btw. If it doesn't work on your machine and your well within recommended specs you're entitled to feel aggrieved.

Saying that, if Luthier can do it then there is a lot of game play to come.

I made this vid to show that it's not all doom and gloom.

God help me, I haven't a clue about Video editing so it's just to show good Gameplay in a big mission and not to show fancy movie skills or fancy flying.
I specifically left on loads of cloud as I know a lot of peeps seem to have a problem with that. Sorry for really bad editing
I keep reading, "get more than 1 plane over London and you can forget it" So I'm going to prove that statement wrong.

Settings were pretty much all highest but trees are low (makes no difference really but I think to many just looks wrong} and houses were on medium

The mission is the standard 'Intercept the Bombers over London' that ships with the game. I have to be honest and I don't think it's set in the heart of London though but it's close!

It has around 20+ Aircraft, yea it's not BoB levels but it gives you an idea and to be honest it was damn fun.

Anyway, it might even be a revelation to some as the game is VERY playable. cheers

http://vimeo.com/21823687

LMAO i register just to answer you .....


Have you ever play a good game before saying that shit ... ?

In your video we can see it is not smooth, and you keep the best point of view in order to have the more fps as possible for the record. ( near house you are not in the cockpit for example )

More over spec which are needed, are not enough to run the game well ...

In this game there is much bug, there is much not realistic things, menu are horrible, map are horrible (in multiplayer) , the ground in juste a big joke , il-2 1946 is better than this game in many point.

My last sentence say everything.
I don't know what they did during 7 years, but the result is juste a big joke for the moment !

More over in the collector edition, in the spitfire pilot's note , some page are print 2 times, some page are not print !!!!!!!!!! in the pilot's instruction, they forget to print spitfire information .....

I think it is your first air plane game to say things like that ...
Go play il-2 1946 & RoF ...



"So I'm going to prove that statement wrong" ====> OK and you didn't play over london .... LOOOOL. And how many feet did you have during the record ? Everybody know when you are high you can easily play...

More over lot of people can play with lot of air plane, this is not a big problem.

Final world is : FANBOY, get a brain and watch the reality !

[Helrza]

Originally Posted by paper

LMAO i register just to answer you .....


Have you ever play a good game before saying that shit ... ?

In your video we can see it is not smooth, and you keep the best point of view in order to have the more fps as possible for the record. ( near house you are not in the cockpit for example )

More over spec which are needed, are not enough to run the game well ...

In this game there is much bug, there is much not realistic things, menu are horrible, map are horrible (in multiplayer) , the ground in juste a big joke , il-2 1946 is better than this game in many point.

My last sentence say everything.
I don't know what they did during 7 years, but the result is juste a big joke for the moment !

More over in the collector edition, in the spitfire pilot's note , some page are print 2 times, some page are not print !!!!!!!!!! in the pilot's instruction, they forget to print spitfire information .....

I think it is your first air plane game to say things like that ...
Go play il-2 1946 & RoF ...



"So I'm going to prove that statement wrong" ====> OK and you didn't play over london .... LOOOOL. And how many feet did you have during the record ? Everybody know when you are high you can easily play...

More over lot of people can play with lot of air plane, this is not a big problem.

Final world is : FANBOY, get a brain and watch the reality !

nice of you to sign up just to flame someone

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=20129

Merry xmas

[JumpingHubert]

Hi Axel, ignore the troll. Your video is great and yes, it is possible to have smooth gameplay @high settings. But not everywhere. Lets see what patches do.

[paper]

Originally Posted by Helrza

nice of you to sign up just to flame someone

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=20129

Merry xmas

i had a good computer enough to use this game in high setting without problem except over london.


Stop to be blind, and be realistic, it is stupid to say things are perfect when they aren't i just want a better game than il-2 1946 with good graphics and it is not.

[Blackdog_kt]

He didn't say it's perfect, you're just putting words in his mouth so you can have stuff to complain about. He said it's almost playable in its current state with some tweaking and that's mostly true.

Also, graphics, graphics, graphics....does anyone of you guys ever fly and operate the airplane or all you care about is looking out the window at the stuff that's causing the game to run slow yet you demanded so much?
Did you see the complex engine management? Did you see that when you lower prop pitch the manifold pressure goes up like in a real aircraft? Did you see the dozens of different aircraft systems that can get damaged, listed in red letters on the top left panel when you get shot at?

These things are far more important than graphics. If they had to use just an upgraded version of IL2 graphics to give us all that, it would still be a very good simulator and guess what, it would run better too.

The game has its problems and they are important, nobody's saying otherwise. But it also has a lot of stuff that nobody else did before. You can't do anything apart from wait for the patches like everyone else, flaming people on the forums won't improve the game for you any faster

[Kikuchiyo]

Originally Posted by paper

LMAO i register just to answer you .....


1)Have you ever play a good game before saying that shit ... ?

2) In your video we can see it is not smooth, and you keep the best point of view in order to have the more fps as possible for the record. ( near house you are not in the cockpit for example )

3) More over spec which are needed, are not enough to run the game well ...

4) In this game there is much bug, there is much not realistic things, menu are horrible, map are horrible (in multiplayer) , the ground in juste a big joke , il-2 1946 is better than this game in many point.

5) My last sentence say everything.
I don't know what they did during 7 years, but the result is juste a big joke for the moment !

6) More over in the collector edition, in the spitfire pilot's note , some page are print 2 times, some page are not print !!!!!!!!!! in the pilot's instruction, they forget to print spitfire information .....

7) I think it is your first air plane game to say things like that ...
Go play il-2 1946 & RoF ...



"So I'm going to prove that statement wrong" ====> OK and you didn't play over london .... LOOOOL. And how many feet did you have during the record ? Everybody know when you are high you can easily play...

More over lot of people can play with lot of air plane, this is not a big problem.

Final world is : FANBOY, get a brain and watch the reality !

1) Define "good game"

2) What's wrong with that?

3) We know the game has optimization issues, but thanks for the reminder.

4) Bugs, no one has refuted that. Opinions = not factual information.

5) Recreated physics for flight models. Extensive research, impressive modeling, and the list goes on.

6) Publisher issue not developer.

7) Each of these games on your list are a) from this developer, and/or b) have been on the market for awhile after dealing with similar issues.

In short your flaming is straw man arguments coupled with opinion and short sighted thinking.

The game needs work, undoubtedly, but calling it a failure after a week of being on the market in an extremely niche market with highly complex issues to deal with is short sighted, and frankly ignorant.

[paper]

Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo

1) Define "good game"

2) What's wrong with that?

3) We know the game has optimization issues, but thanks for the reminder.

4) Bugs, no one has refuted that. Opinions = not factual information.

5) Recreated physics for flight models. Extensive research, impressive modeling, and the list goes on.

6) Publisher issue not developer.

7) Each of these games on your list are a) from this developer, and/or b) have been on the market for awhile after dealing with similar issues.

In short your flaming is straw man arguments coupled with opinion and short sighted thinking.

The game needs work, undoubtedly, but calling it a failure after a week of being on the market in an extremely niche market with highly complex issues to deal with is short sighted, and frankly ignorant.

lol fanboy CoD you should look people around you and around the world.

For il-2 1946's the game is actually a fail.

I should make a video of all things wich are not real in the game compare to il-2 1946 ...

Maximum speed has not effect ... G effect are not really dangerous for the plane (it's rare to breack the plane because of speed + G ) ... Landing are sooooo easy ! The list goes on and a fanboy won't understand it.

By physics i don't speak about visual aspect, but fly aspect.

6th aspect , both have failed.

Go to fly in the real life , and play rof/ il-1946 , and go back to clod maybe you will understand.

I'm here just to say the reality in order that developper can improve the game. I won't say "your game is perfect oh yesss" , it's false it is not.

ps: read, i told you good game ( WW air plane sim ) RoF and il-2 1946 + AEP
And agree with you , the game need lot of work to be finished. ^^

[Kikuchiyo]

Originally Posted by paper

lol fanboy CoD you should look people around you and around the world.

For il-2 1946's the game is actually a fail.

I should make a video of all things wich are not real in the game compare to il-2 1946 ...

Maximum speed has not effect ... G effect are not really dangerous for the plane (it's rare to breack the plane because of speed + G ) ... Landing are sooooo easy ! The list goes on and a fanboy won't understand it.

By physics i don't speak about visual aspect, but fly aspect.

6th aspect , both have failed.

Go to fly in the real life , and play rof/ il-1946 , and go back to clod maybe you will understand.

I'm here just to say the reality in order that developper can improve the game. I won't say "your game is perfect oh yesss" , it's false it is not.

ps: read, i told you good game ( WW air plane sim ) RoF and il-2 1946 + AEP
And agree with you , the game need lot of work to be finished. ^^

Fanboi? What because I see potential? Also this doesn't answer my point which was "Define a "good game." Attacking me doesn't refute anything.

Again as I said 1946 had growning pains, and again thanks for the reminder.

Uhhhhhh, not an argument to what I said.

Again no one refuted it has bugs.........

Urm, not a valid argument to my point arguing yours.......

What? You seem to not understand logical arguments.

Simulation and real life are very different. Current technology (and past) cannot completely recreate reality.

Thank you for trying but you seem to fail simple logic 101.

I don't care if you call me a fanboy for simply pointing out the failings of your logic. Yes, I am hopeful that this sim will fruit, but name calling accomplishes nothing.

[Hooves]

Originally Posted by paper

lol fanboy CoD you should look people around you and around the world.

For il-2 1946's the game is actually a fail.

I should make a video of all things wich are not real in the game compare to il-2 1946 ...

Maximum speed has not effect ... G effect are not really dangerous for the plane (it's rare to breack the plane because of speed + G ) ... Landing are sooooo easy ! The list goes on and a fanboy won't understand it.

By physics i don't speak about visual aspect, but fly aspect.

6th aspect , both have failed.

Go to fly in the real life , and play rof/ il-1946 , and go back to clod maybe you will understand.

I'm here just to say the reality in order that developper can improve the game. I won't say "your game is perfect oh yesss" , it's false it is not.

ps: read, i told you good game ( WW air plane sim ) RoF and il-2 1946 + AEP
And agree with you , the game need lot of work to be finished. ^^

So Im guessing you didnt play IL-2 or even ROF when the both FIRST came out. Man you are one HUGE jerk off to people who are just posting the truth. The game is NOT perfect but no one is saying it is. IT IS playable. and it WILL get better. And how do I know that? Well, you have pointed out the best proof. Look at 1946. its a great game now after many years of patches and changes. And thats is exactly where CoD will be.


I applaud Oleg and the team for having the courage to make a game that is set for the FUTURE of gaming tech. They will always get blutards like you who want it to run like gangbusters on their Rig. But it wont and I for one cant WAIT for the future cards and memory to come make this game absolutely redonkulous!!