View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-13-2012, 09:35 PM
1984 1984 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IceFire View Post
I see what you mean about the armored windscreens. I tend to end up flying the Pe-2 rather than the 109 so I hadn't considered this an issue previously


and i remembered third reason, without armor better view forward, personally for me much better... 3 reasons...

and, maybe, if really need new option, for example, this can looks like difficulty settings...

Quote:
I didn't know that the Yak-9K had an ammo counter. Interesting!
you know, maybe, it's correct only for prototype, maybe not, but all this is not so important how fix performances of T/K and, if i'm not mistaken, view forward in cockpit of all 9s...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pursuivant View Post
If I were going to add an additional Mustang model to the game, it would be the P-51H.
if talk in total, agree with you, but if talk sensibly, in 45 was built only 555 H and they even not fought against japan and in korea, right? so, mustangs with allison have much more chances and reasons...

interesting, DT has plans about this?

Quote:
...or as a HUD display would be a nice touch.
if i'm understood you correctly, this is can be good idea, especially, if plane had ammo counter, but no photos with him...


and again about i-16, old planes and field mods... i'm not specialist, but even 10 mins of research gives lot of variants (attached), of all years, and theoretically this easy to do... for example, third photo, type 24 with 2 rs-82, and some changes (here, maybe, due to dirt) in 1943... i think, he can be slowly at 50 kph...

and you can see what in game wrong 3d model of shvak for i-16...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg I16_10.jpg (54.1 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg 1745445_FEBDAF9_CFA8.jpg (81.6 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg image.jpg (184.8 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg zhyikov1.jpg (44.5 KB, 27 views)
Reply With Quote