How about markings for static planes...

[addman]

it's not like a totally new concept for flightsims or anything.;) Seriously, why isn't it in the game?

[41Sqn_Stormcrow]

+1

[Plt Off JRB Meaker]

+1..............Can't believe they were left out,surely they could have been kinked in with the flyable and AI:rolleyes:

[addman]

Also while you're at it, throw in a static Cr.42 will you.;)

[ATAG_Dutch]

Agreed.

This is a real pain in the proverbial for ground based screenshots/video.

[Bonkin]

Agreed. Looks pretty crap to see all these aircraft dotted around your airfield when none of them have any markings.

[kedrednael]

So you have small cars, each with different small number plates, but not static planes with big markings.. :confused: . It sounds pretty stupid, like bad development decisions.

[TomcatViP]

Also while you're at it, throw in a static Cr.42 will you.;)

Flyable !!!!

(use the buggy G-50 FM)

[ElAurens]

Flyable !!!!

(use the buggy G-50 FM)

NO, flyable with it's own good FM, and a proper FM for the G50 as well.

And also a proper engine damage/temperature/whatever for the Blenheim.

[addman]

Flyable !!!!

(use the buggy G-50 FM)

NO, flyable with it's own good FM, and a proper FM for the G50 as well.

And also a proper engine damage/temperature/whatever for the Blenheim.

Hear! hear! Cr.42 flyable and corrected G.50 FM. I love these planes, there aren't enough crap planes in this sim, the G.50 could be a little less crap though and they could fix some of the missing stuff on it like a working fuel cock for example. In every god darned new WWII flightsim we get it's always the 23 different flavors of Spitfires, Messerschmits and the likes. I really appreciate that luthier actually put the G.50 and the Br.20 in there but they have really been neglected in patch improvements compared to the overly pampered 109's and spitfires. I guess I'm in minority when it comes to prefering diverse plane sets but that's part of the charm, not being like everyone else. ;)

P.S Some added clothing/flight gear for the Italian pilot avatar would be nice, he's Italian for Pete's sake!

[Bloblast]

Good point

[senseispcc]

Wait, patience, patience, we shall bomb Engeland into surrender...

[Plt Off JRB Meaker]

Wait, patience, patience, we shall bomb Engeland into surrender...

I don't think so old chap,us RAF boys are always here ready to give you Huns a bloody nose!................however a shiny new flyable Wellington bomber would make the task a tad more enjoyable one,you listening Luthier?:-)

[Foo'bar]

So you have small cars, each with different small number plates, but not static planes with big markings.. :confused: . It sounds pretty stupid, like bad development decisions.

No decision. Just lost. So hard to understand?

[Ataros]

Agreed.

This is a real pain in the proverbial for ground based screenshots/video.

For video replace static aircraft with not static put on "idle".

This solution would work for offline gameplay as well. However too many non-static airgroups online degrade performance. But static aircraft degrade performance and loading time online too and better not be used.

Static aircraft are missing many features in order to reduce hardware load. This is their purpose. If performance is not an issue for you just use non-static aircraft instead.

[addman]

I agree with you, but also want to advise you'll have to take a back seat for the fixes, as the fixes will come for the majority before the minority. But I'd love to see more planes, and see them with working FM.

I understand this, being a realist sucks sometimes.:(