Farewell to the Harrier

[dkwookie]

Due to spending cuts in the UK the Harrier is being withdrawn from service today. Sad to see it go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkFOEE6vUds

[Gilly]

Another sad day in our recent military history. I've just watched them on the BBC leaving Cottesmore. Yet another of our brilliant designs consigned to history. Very sad to see them go.

[winny]

I logged on to post a goodbye to the harrier thread but the wookie beat me to it.. A sad day for a superb aircraft.

I wonder how much a used harrier costs these days..

[dkwookie]

I logged on to post a goodbye to the harrier thread but the wookie beat me to it.. A sad day for a superb aircraft.

I wonder how much a used harrier costs these days..

I was thinking about how much they cost. They will be up for sale soon they said on BBC. They will probably end up in a middle east country. I doubt Argentina will be bidding for them!

I watched that take off from Cottesmore too Gilly, very sad day.

A good article on the decision to scrap them:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11997084

[flynlion]

Doesn't this leave the Royal Navy without a fixed wing combat aircraft? Seems odd that they would retire the Harrier before the F-35 is ready, guess they plan to do it all with land based planes.

[dkwookie]

Yeah we won't have any carrier based fixed wing until 2020. If things go tits up somewhere we won't be able to respond

[olife]

the harrier!!
what a great plane!!
congratulations to the english people,u know how to built a very good planes!!!
...and snif the harriers kick the ass of a french product called MIRAGE in the falkland war..but it was good...because save the freedom
respect english boys

[flynlion]

Yeah we won't have any carrier based fixed wing until 2020. If things go tits up somewhere we won't be able to respond

Aren't things already tits up? What's the Royal Navy fighting with now?

[winny]

Aren't things already tits up? What's the Royal Navy fighting with now?

Dunno maybe we're just gonna let the French navy do our dirty work for a while.

Are the Royal Navy retiring thiers too? Or just RAF?

[FOZ_1983]

Dunno maybe we're just gonna let the French navy do our dirty work for a while.

Are the Royal Navy retiring thiers too? Or just RAF?

Royal navy are retiring theirs to. Were relying on the tornado to our jobs for us, but already they are over pushed in afghanistan as the runway is pretty short, where as the harriers had a 95% success rate for missions, the tornado is much less.

Until the F35 comes into active service were pretty much relying on land based aircraft and erm.... the rest of europe!!


Shocking!!

[olife]

[QUOTE=winny;204703]Dunno maybe we're just gonna let the French navy do our dirty work for a while.

loool!!!yes but our RAFALES FIGHTERS BOMBERS CAN'T FLY WITHOUT CRASHS THIS TIMES!!
HARD TO DO A GOOD JOB AS IT!!!

[olife]

about the french navy...

[Robotic Pope]

Yeah its a real shame. Its not like these planes are obsolete, the GR.9 is argueably the best close air suport aircraft in the world. The problem is that that is all it really does, todays combat aircraft need to be multirole.

This wouldn't have happened if they hadn't messed around in upgrading the old FRS1 sea harrier to FA.2 standard with the blue vixen radar. If they had instead taken the new at that time Harrier GR.5 and put the blue vixen in that they would now still have a modern Sea Harrier with all the ground attack capability of the GR.9 aswell as one of the most advanced air intercept radars on the planet, making it multirole as a fleet defender. Its abilities would be far greater than the current AV8B+ Harrier II. If we had this aircraft today I have no doubt it would not be retired.

Whoevers idea it was to update a very old original Sea Harrier design with highly advanced systems when a brand new aircraft design was right there ready to be used, in the end they are the ones at fault.

[flynlion]

Royal navy are retiring theirs to. Were relying on the tornado to our jobs for us, but already they are over pushed in afghanistan as the runway is pretty short, where as the harriers had a 95% success rate for missions, the tornado is much less.

Until the F35 comes into active service were pretty much relying on land based aircraft and erm.... the rest of europe!!


Shocking!!

Very shocking, considering the Royal Navy's proud history. For a land based force it almost makes sense to retire it, I mean, what good is a short field capable combat plane if the big cargo birds can't get in to service it? But at sea, with limited budgets and thus small deck ships, its hard to imagine a better choice than the Harrier. I'm sorry to see it go.

[bobbysocks]

a real shame to let them go. always enjoyed seeing them at air shows. i believe the usmc still has them.

[Robotic Pope]

a real shame to let them go. always enjoyed seeing them at air shows. i believe the usmc still has them.

Yes the US marines will continue to use Harriers until they get their F35B. The Spanish and Italian Navies also still fly the same AV8B+ Harrier II as the USMC. So the American Harrier does live on, but the real British Harrier is no more :(

[markyboyacebassist]

After reading 'Sea Harrier Over the Falklands: A Maverick at War' by
Commander Nigel "Sharkey" Ward DSC, AFC, RN, you cannot fail to be impressed by this great fighter, far superior to the Tornado.
He says of the Harrier,

'It is because of its flexibility, its inherent flexibility, when we went to the Falklands, the whole world including most of the Royal Air Force was saying they are going to get their bottoms smacked because they’ve got no airpower, well what we had were 20 Sea Harrier aircraft, and the Argentines had 200 military aircraft against us and so we had a battle on our hands which we won because first of all we were very good in fighter combat, secondly, from the carrier you can generate many more sorties per day than you can from an airfield ashore because of the manner in which we do our business and so although we were totally outnumbered we managed to put enough aircraft in the sky all the time to oppose the opposition so you can say almost without any question that the Harrier, or the Sea Harrier as it was called, the Navy Harrier, ensured success in the Falklands.'

[The Few]

With the retirement of the Harrier what do they intend to do with the carrier fleet? Early retirement as well?

[Robotic Pope]

With the retirement of the Harrier what do they intend to do with the carrier fleet? Early retirement as well?

The Flagship carrier HMS Ark Royal is gone. After its refit is done HMS Ilustrious will continue as helicopter carrier until it gets decomisioned in 2014. The Royal navy will then have HMS Ocean (an Amphibious Assault ship) fresh from refit working as a helicopter platform flying Sea kings/Merlins, Lynx Wildcats and Apache. This will continue until the new carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth enters service as the worlds biggest Helicopter carrier. Then they will have to decide which carrier they will convert for fixed wing aircraft, the QE or the 2nd new carrier that has to be built even though nobody wants it - HMS Prince of Wales. They will then be able to have USN Super Hornets and French Navy Rafales operating from there untill the F35C finaly arives.

[flynlion]

Prince of Wales is s'posed to be big enough for Hornets? Wow. Those big assed, full sized "super" carriers cost a fortune. Seems like it would be cheaper to keep a few smaller "helicopter" ships around complete w Harriers and add the F-35's later as they become available. What am I missing?

[Gilly]

Anyone fancy going halves?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/WOW-EX-RAF-4-SQN-Harrier-Jump-Jet-Aircraft-XW269-RARE-/130482517099?pt=UK_CPV_Aviation_SM&hash=item1e615d346b

[flynlion]

I wonder what it would cost to make it air worthy? Right now it's just a fancy paper weight.

[FOZ_1983]

I wonder what it would cost to make it air worthy? Right now it's just a fancy paper weight.

Probably more than we could all afford if we were to chip in.

Could always try? Start a "IL2 players to get the Harrier flying again fund"

[bobbysocks]

I wonder what it would cost to make it air worthy? Right now it's just a fancy paper weight.

probably about 5 times that! its missing an engine and probably most of the cockpit components ( gauges, radios, flight computers, etc.). when i saw that i thought the price was pretty cheap until i read what you dont get.