View Full Version : in case anyone missed it , updates to the update
guiltyspark
09-29-2009, 02:37 PM
Hi everyone
Here are more details for title update
* keyboard support
* P-51 flightmodel changed
* B-17 damage model changed
* separate machine gun and cannons fire with 30% pressed trigger (on default layouts)
* MP balancing: 5 points for air victory, -1 point for death
* Enemies AI and allies AI were improved
* Condition for unlock aircrafts were changed.
* improved sounds for stall
* Landing brakes on fligh stick were fixed
* low lod for aircrafts tuned (to be more visible on SD resolutions)
Date for title update is still to be announced but it is in a final QA.
guiltyspark
09-29-2009, 02:38 PM
i really do wish the devs would please make down on the hat switch on the throttle the flap control so we can have the Y button on the ace edge the cannons
King Jareth
09-29-2009, 02:41 PM
dude my thread even had an almost identical name! (http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=10178)
MorgothNL
09-29-2009, 02:41 PM
dude my thread even had an almost identical name! (http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=10178)
lol... I actually thought that that was this one.. I was wondering why it suddenly only had 2 posts
Ancient Seraph
09-29-2009, 03:07 PM
And again the question: Are you actually paid for random posts like this? You've got to be a millionair by now.. Is this how you could afford your Ace Edge?
FOZ_1983
09-29-2009, 03:12 PM
And again the question: Are you actually paid for random posts like this? You've got to be a millionair by now.. Is this how you could afford your Ace Edge?
:confused:
Ancient Seraph
09-29-2009, 03:19 PM
:confused:
http://forum.yuplay.com/index.php?showtopic=27
A useless topic in which he presents a (completely inaccurate) list of planes which he claims are what the community wants.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=9992
A useless topic where he asks where the developers are :S. I'd think they'd be busy with the update, which they probably were. And still, what answer did he expect? 'Here'?
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=10181
A useless topic in which he presents the list of items included in the update, without any reference to the original post on the dev's forum.
These are just the examples in which I asked the same question. If you look up more of his posts you'll notice that some are actually useful, but most is rubbish. Hence, he is known as the forum troll.
guiltyspark
09-29-2009, 03:24 PM
And again the question: Are you actually paid for random posts like this? You've got to be a millionair by now.. Is this how you could afford your Ace Edge?
its not really a random post and i suggest you stop crying every time i make a post , it makes you look like some sort of pretentious bitch with nothing to do but point fingers and call people "trolls" because they like to post feedback on a game
Anton Yudintsev
09-29-2009, 03:29 PM
I've just read a where are developers thread.
Guys, I am on forum almost every day - because it was my starting web page in browser, and I close/open it often.
I am reading some of the threads/posts, but definetly not all of them.
And not very accurate.
We are monitoring your feedback/suggestions often, mostly in a special threads. However, even in 'suggestions to devs' thread there is way too much flood, so some things can be skipped (for example, becuase they automatically somehow marked as read on this forum).
But I am not answering to most of posts, because deeds are telling more, than words :) We are working, and I am really busy.
However, I apologize if someone hasn't recieved answer.
All I can say - keep answering, visit the other forum http://forum.yuplay.com/index.php?showforum=7 and ask there also.
Or, probably your question can be found already in answers from me or someone else earlier. My time is as valuable as yours, and I don't want to repeat one thing a lot of time. And, if it is offending or silly - I probably won't answer also :)
guiltyspark
09-29-2009, 03:30 PM
I've just read a where are developers thread.
Guys, I am on forum almost every day - because it was my starting web page in browser, and I close/open it often.
I am reading some of the threads/posts, but definetly not all of them.
And not very accurate.
We are monitoring your feedback/suggestions often, mostly in a special threads. However, even in 'suggestions to devs' thread there is way too much flood, so some things can be skipped (for example, becuase they automatically somehow marked as read on this forum).
But I am not answering to most of posts, because deeds are telling more, than words :) We are working, and I am really busy.
However, I apologize if someone hasn't recieved answer.
All I can say - keep answering, visit the other forum http://forum.yuplay.com/index.php?showforum=7 and ask there also.
Or, probably your question can be found already in answers from me or someone else earlier. My time is as valuable as yours, and I don't want to repeat one thing a lot of time. And, if it is offending or silly - I probably won't answer also :)
thanks anton
haitch40
09-29-2009, 03:33 PM
ok Anton thanks btw u r the best development team ive ever met
Ancient Seraph
09-29-2009, 03:36 PM
its not really a random post and i suggest you stop crying every time i make a post , it makes you look like some sort of pretentious bitch with nothing to do but point fingers and call people "trolls" because they like to post feedback on a game
I would like to point out I know you gave some valuable input, and I've responded in a serious manner 80% of the time, however, making a new thread covering a subject that's already been covered in another thread is something which highly annoys me, and causes me to react like this. I apologize for the personal attack, it wasn't my intention to make you look like a bad person. I would like to point out this thread and the other two posted are completely useless in my eyes.
guiltyspark
09-29-2009, 03:39 PM
I would like to point out I know you gave some valuable input, and I've responded in a serious manner 80% of the time, however, making a new thread covering a subject that's already been covered in another thread is something which highly annoys me, and causes me to react like this. I apologize for the personal attack, it wasn't my intention to make you look like a bad person. I would like to point out this thread and the other two posted are completely useless in my eyes.
thats great and i accept the apology , but in truth at the time i made this thread the other post was at the very bottom of the page and i made a quick scan for a similar post because normally it would be a popular topic at the top with lots of people being excited .
didnt look far down enough
King Jareth
09-29-2009, 03:42 PM
...the other post was at the very bottom of the page and i made a quick scan for a similar post because normally it would be a popular topic at the top with lots of people being excited .
didnt look far down enough
I'm just not popular :(
Steyr_amr
09-29-2009, 04:09 PM
I'm just not popular :(
Well I appeciated your post, I found it both useful and informative :grin:
mattd27
09-29-2009, 07:04 PM
You know I think it's great that yesterday House MD made a thread about the B17 damage model being off, the devs recognized it and today we're told it's being fixed in the update. That really says a lot about the devs interactions with the community. :)
play2often
09-29-2009, 07:27 PM
have they mentioned anything about fixing the fw-190?
Ancient Seraph
09-29-2009, 07:30 PM
have they mentioned anything about fixing the fw-190?
Nope, nothing about it yet. There's an "Fw-190 for president"-thread here (http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=10179) ;).
Marchochias
09-30-2009, 01:24 AM
How will the landing brakes work? Are there currently landing brakes? I have no clue how to use them if there are.
Also, how will the separate machine gun/cannon fire work?
Both features sound awesome. Can't wait for the changes to the P51 and B17 as well.
FOZ_1983
09-30-2009, 01:37 AM
How will the landing brakes work? Are there currently landing brakes? I have no clue how to use them if there are.
Also, how will the separate machine gun/cannon fire work?
Both features sound awesome. Can't wait for the changes to the P51 and B17 as well.
As it is the "landing brakes" on the control pad are simply just keep the throttle held down :) thus braking.
Well with a joystick when the throttle is at 0% it doesnt active a brake etc so slowing down is a long and scary process lol.
I've lost count of how many famers fields i've ploughed into because i've run out of runway!!
Only ones that seem easy enough to land on and leave you with enough runway to take off from are the big ones like manston etc :D
Marchochias
09-30-2009, 02:03 AM
As it is the "landing brakes" on the control pad are simply just keep the throttle held down :) thus braking.
Well with a joystick when the throttle is at 0% it doesnt active a brake etc so slowing down is a long and scary process lol.
I've lost count of how many famers fields i've ploughed into because i've run out of runway!!
Only ones that seem easy enough to land on and leave you with enough runway to take off from are the big ones like manston etc :D
I use the Aviator joystick, no wonder I need such a long runway to land, even at low speeds! Though I guess that makes my successful landing of the Me 163 in a field on Simulator more impressive, right? :grin:
edal86
09-30-2009, 08:56 AM
http://forum.yuplay.com/index.php?showtopic=27
A useless topic in which he presents a (completely inaccurate) list of planes which he claims are what the community wants.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=9992
A useless topic where he asks where the developers are :S. I'd think they'd be busy with the update, which they probably were. And still, what answer did he expect? 'Here'?
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=10181
A useless topic in which he presents the list of items included in the update, without any reference to the original post on the dev's forum.
These are just the examples in which I asked the same question. If you look up more of his posts you'll notice that some are actually useful, but most is rubbish. Hence, he is known as the forum troll.
lol, I must agree I have read some useless thread titles from you guiltyspark but no harm done just ignore them, actually this is the first i open to read lol.
iannik
09-30-2009, 02:40 PM
No new planes in upcoming DLC?
I hpe next planes if never release will be complete of cockpit
iannik
09-30-2009, 02:43 PM
I use the Aviator joystick, no wonder I need such a long runway to land, even at low speeds! Though I guess that makes my successful landing of the Me 163 in a field on Simulator more impressive, right? :grin:
Do you know Komet landed as glider with engine off?
King Jareth
09-30-2009, 02:44 PM
No new planes in upcoming DLC?
I hpe next planes if never release will be complete of cockpit
This is about an update not DLC.
Ancient Seraph
09-30-2009, 03:08 PM
Do you know Komet landed as glider with engine off?
That's because it only had fuel for 7 mins :P.
Lincoln's Revenge
09-30-2009, 08:16 PM
If they are going to make the B-17 more resistant to damage then they better tone down it's performance characteristics a bit. As it is it is too fast. Accelerates too fast, and is too easy to use as an enormous trans sonic
dive bomber.
Ancient Seraph
09-30-2009, 08:22 PM
If they are going to make the B-17 more resistant to damage then they better tone down it's performance characteristics a bit. As it is it is too fast. Accelerates too fast, and is too easy to use as an enormous trans sonic
dive bomber.
Let me guess, arcade? In Realistic it's slow to fly and slow to turn. Performance seems ok there.
Lincoln's Revenge
09-30-2009, 08:32 PM
Let me guess, arcade? In Realistic it's slow to fly and slow to turn. Performance seems ok there.
Nope, never played a single match on arcade and never will.
Like I said, the main problem for me is with people DIVING in the plane and retaining too much maneuverability in the dive and too much speed after they pull out of the dive and subsequently climb back to a higher altitude. Let alone the fact that flying that way would would rip the airframe apart. But unlike the PC version, I don't think its possible to damage your aircraft by flying it beyond it's structural limits.
FOZ_1983
09-30-2009, 08:51 PM
Nope, never played a single match on arcade and never will.
Like I said, the main problem for me is with people DIVING in the plane and retaining too much maneuverability in the dive and too much speed after they pull out of the dive and subsequently climb back to a higher altitude. Let alone the fact that flying that way would would rip the airframe apart. But unlike the PC version, I don't think its possible to damage your aircraft by flying it beyond it's structural limits.
I agree with what your saying. I know this to be true because i have the B17 and use this tactic in strike sometimes :)
structural damage IS possible :D if you get the hurricane into a dive, its wings will get torn off at approx 540mph.
not tried with any other plane yet.
beaker126
09-30-2009, 09:45 PM
I agree with what your saying. I know this to be true because i have the B17 and use this tactic in strike sometimes :)
structural damage IS possible :D if you get the hurricane into a dive, its wings will get torn off at approx 540mph.
not tried with any other plane yet.
I pointed an Me-262 straight down once and firewalled it. Going straight down in a power dive, I believe it might be possible for this plane to break mach one. Unfortunately, it's not a repeatable experience. With the same plane that is. My tail came off.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.