Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #701  
Old 07-23-2012, 06:08 PM
maxim42 maxim42 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Hmmm, what about Arado Ar-196? There is lack of flyable hydroplanes in il-2 1946 and the plane I've just mentioned would be good choice to make it flyable. It doesn't have any internal view but the external model is pretty nice so making the cockpit would be, in my opinion, good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #702  
Old 07-23-2012, 11:23 PM
Spudkopf's Avatar
Spudkopf Spudkopf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxim42 View Post
Hmmm, what about Arado Ar-196? There is lack of flyable hydroplanes in il-2 1946 and the plane I've just mentioned would be good choice to make it flyable. It doesn't have any internal view but the external model is pretty nice so making the cockpit would be, in my opinion, good idea.
G’day maxim42

As much as I’d also love to see the Ar-196 flyable in the sim as it is one of my sentimental favourites, it’s a simple but sad fact that the current mission set does not readily cater well to it or many of the other non-flyable recon types, sure it was armed with a 20mm cannon in each of the wings and a 7.9mm MG in the lower cowl, but these appear to be more or less ineffective against even the smallest water craft within the sim, at least this has been my experience as I’ve strafed and emptied magazines into enough of them on numerous occasions to no avail, however the ability to carry a 50kg bomb under each wing may be the only saving grace as these would be little more effective on such targets.

Unfortunately unless or until the vulnerability of these smaller class of vessels is reduced, something that I’d like to add to the wish list by the way, then the only realistic option available to this plane is for it to continue being available only as target fodder
__________________
Spud

Reply With Quote
  #703  
Old 07-24-2012, 12:42 PM
magot magot is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 53
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheshouse View Post
Heres a request for a "small" change in the gui.

When using Full Mission Builder View/Object/Show you will always see the object displayed in its Summer skin.

Could this be changed so that if you are on a Desert or Winter map you would see the object in the Desert or Winter skin, as appropriate?

This only affects the drop down viewer. The object appears ok if you zoom into the map.

Ashe
You think for better show how is present current texture on model in viewer?
Due work on ground units objects? Don´t forgot that DT do not open interface for mods, for "public" it´s not open possibilty create skins for ground units and look how present winter skin on tank.

But I understand: you need any mod tool IL2 model viewer
__________________
----------------------------------------------

For bugreports, help and support contact:
daidalos.team@googlemail.com
Reply With Quote
  #704  
Old 07-25-2012, 12:11 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Might it be possible to incorporate skins in the model viewer for a given AC or skinnable object? That way we could look at new skins without having to launch a mission.
Reply With Quote
  #705  
Old 07-25-2012, 07:12 PM
lebobouba lebobouba is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Default

For me, it's rather the update of missing or incorrect loadouts.
It concerns as well the playable aircrafts as the AI.
These modifications do not ask for big works.

(here are some proofs for : Fw190D9, Hurricane Field Mod, FM-2, Ki-43, P-51D, Spitfire Mk Vb & Vc, P-400 & P-39N, B5N2)


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21


By null at 2012-07-21
Reply With Quote
  #706  
Old 07-25-2012, 07:15 PM
lebobouba lebobouba is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Default

Ah, a little error for the P-39N
This is the good pic:


By null at 2012-07-21
Reply With Quote
  #707  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:45 AM
kennel kennel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

Panzerschrek rocket loadout for FW190F8, The Luftwaffe seem lacking in this area
Reply With Quote
  #708  
Old 07-26-2012, 01:27 PM
gaunt1 gaunt1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: India
Posts: 314
Default

You mean the Panzerblitz? Panzerschreck was a shoulder launched AT rocket.
Reply With Quote
  #709  
Old 07-26-2012, 02:37 PM
_1SMV_Gitano _1SMV_Gitano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaunt1 View Post
You mean the Panzerblitz? Panzerschreck was a shoulder launched AT rocket.
Panzerschrek was also used as stop-gap measure before the Panzerblitz came into service, but it was very difficult to use with proficence beacuse it had to be launched from close distance from the target.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #710  
Old 07-26-2012, 04:12 PM
kennel kennel is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 90
Default

I mean Panzerblitz rockets, I stand corrected
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.