Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #691  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:18 PM
WWTaco WWTaco is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20
Default

One of my squadmates had brought up a good point, Not sure if it has been asked before so here it goes.

Will objects(Ships, Vehicles etc.) be dynamic in dogfight maps?

It would be great to have ships that moved over time in the dogfight maps like they do in CO-OP's.

S!
  #692  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:23 PM
Tvrdi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Question for Oleg: Would BoB: SoW take advantage of dual GPU "technology" (SLI, Crossfire or whatever)...the same question for dual CPUs...
  #693  
Old 02-19-2008, 08:42 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

My questions to Mr. Oleg,

a, Will - random - weapon jams occur/modelled?
b, Will onboard systems capable of unjamming aircraft guns - on appropriate aircraft - modelled?
c, Will misting, fogging, freezing oiling of windscreen etc. modelled?
d, Will de-icing devices, windscreen heaters etc. modelled - on appropriate aircraft - to battle these effects?
e, Will it be possible to fire a flare from inside the cocpit (like in real planes for signalling, could be fun for MP)
f, When will Beta start and how can one apply for testing.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
  #694  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:56 PM
VMF-214_HaVoK's Avatar
VMF-214_HaVoK VMF-214_HaVoK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mt. Union, PA USA
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
My questions to Mr. Oleg,

a, Will - random - weapon jams occur/modelled?
b, Will onboard systems capable of unjamming aircraft guns - on appropriate aircraft - modelled?
c, Will misting, fogging, freezing oiling of windscreen etc. modelled?
d, Will de-icing devices, windscreen heaters etc. modelled - on appropriate aircraft - to battle these effects?
e, Will it be possible to fire a flare from inside the cocpit (like in real planes for signalling, could be fun for MP)
f, When will Beta start and how can one apply for testing.
All excellent questions and Im very interested in the answer for question F.
__________________
  #695  
Old 02-20-2008, 07:55 AM
Erkki Erkki is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 220
Default

In the SOW BOB, will bullets that have hit things just cause some damage (like in IL2) or will they be shred into pieces that can do their own nasty work too? How about explosive cannon rounds? And will pilots & gunners get injured/killed from explosions and shrapnels too instead of only direct hits from bullets(like in IL2)?
  #696  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:38 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
f, When will Beta start and how can one apply for testing.
...and more close to beta - each week like in old good time with IL-2...

Right now we have 50 days between the last two updates so we are light years away from anything like 2-3 weeks or even less, so I don't see the Beta stage before autumn 2008, if at all.
  #697  
Old 02-20-2008, 04:58 PM
AirSerg AirSerg is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Russia
Posts: 2
Default

Hello, I have some questions to Oleg on N1K Shiden.

The present realization automatic a flap brings sets of inconveniences since their use in many cases prevents in fight - at a dive any maneuvers conduct a flap that results to plum of energy or to distortion of a sight to release. As on maneuver, there is a preparation for a capture of anticipation and frequently flaps unexpectedly leave and force down a sight. In this connection a question:

1. Why the system of automatic flaps is realized not switched off, what technical reasons accompanied this?

2. Whether probably to realize switching-off of system in release of a patch 4.09m? Whether there is a chance? (I know, that it not big, but...)

Very much many complain of system, she is certainly very interesting, but would be useful in a case if she can be disconnected.

P.S. Excuse for my bad English, for the best understanding I shall result the text in Russian.

Quote:
Здравствуйте, я имею несколько вопросов к Олегу по N1K Shiden.

Настоящая реализация автоматических закрылок приносит множества неудобств, т.к. их использование во многих случаях мешает в бою - при пикировании любые маневры ведут к выпуску закрылок, что приводит к сливу энергии или искажению прицела. Так же на маневре, идет подготовка к взятию упреждения и часто закрылки неожиданно выходят и сбивают прицел. В связи с чем вопрос:

1. Почему система автоматических закрылков реализована не выключаемой, какие технические причины сопутствовали этому?

2. Возможно ли реализовать отключение системы в релизе патча 4.09м? Есть ли шанс? (я знаю, что он не большой, но...)

Очень многие жалуются на систему, она безусловно очень интересна, но была бы полезна в случае если ее можно будет отключать.
Thanks.

Last edited by AirSerg; 02-20-2008 at 05:01 PM.
  #698  
Old 02-20-2008, 11:25 PM
BadAim BadAim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 984
Default

Unfortunately you will probably not see the solution you are looking for, but I can give you one: just watch your wing loading, if you don't change your state, the flaps won't deploy. I grant that it's easier said than done, but I'm not a great pilot and I have no trouble whatsoever after spending some time with the George and paying attention to when the flaps deploy. Eventually you'll be expecting them every time and you'll find many occasions to thank the appropriate Jappanese gods for them. Go fire up QMB and spend a couple of hours thrashing 'er and you will fall in love with 'er.
  #699  
Old 02-21-2008, 04:48 AM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

During development and testing of the NIK2 Auto flap system a lot of time was spent to get the deployment and retraction G thresholds right to prevent nusiance cycling in and out and still provide some tangible benefit.

It was requested to also have an On/Off switch but this was not incorporated, though I cannot recall why at the time it could not be so.
  #700  
Old 02-21-2008, 03:26 PM
AirSerg AirSerg is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Russia
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadAim View Post
Unfortunately you will probably not see the solution you are looking for, but I can give you one: just watch your wing loading, if you don't change your state, the flaps won't deploy. I grant that it's easier said than done, but I'm not a great pilot and I have no trouble whatsoever after spending some time with the George and paying attention to when the flaps deploy.

The reason deeper. There is also a dependence on style of fight. At fight with high speeds - flaps jump out constantly and it results to very not to desirable reduction of speed. I very much love this plane and I fly on him much, but absence of system of the switch of automatic system prevents in many cases. This not only my opinion - among my familiar very much many do not fly on Shiden because of them. And it is skilled pilots.

The system is very interesting and in a life was very useful device. In IL-2 ergonomics, therefore release a flap in fighting position is not modelled is equally easy for any plane in a simulator - made by pressing of one button. That reduces advantages of system in a simulator a little.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
During development and testing of the NIK2 Auto flap system a lot of time was spent to get the deployment and retraction G thresholds right to prevent nusiance cycling in and out and still provide some tangible benefit.

It was requested to also have an On/Off switch but this was not incorporated, though I cannot recall why at the time it could not be so.
I have understood, what system automatic a flap could make disconnected, but have not made for any reasons? It would be good, if you could recollect why

From Oleg's answers at a forum www.sukhoi.ru, published today:
Quote:
29. Почему система автоматических закрылков реализована не выключаемой, какие технические причины? Возможно ли реализовать отключение системы в релизе патча 4.09м?
Про реализацию системы - нет. Про причины не знаю
Quote:
29. Why the system of automatic flaps is realized not switched off, what technical reasons? Whether probably to realize switching-off of system in release of a patch 4.09м?
About realization of system - is not present. About the reasons I do not know
Answers

It is very a pity

Oleg, all the same it can is possible to find out why? Very interestingly.

Thanks!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.